<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Accuracy Systems Sub MOA Mini 14</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/18/accuracy-systems-sub-moa-mini-14/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/18/accuracy-systems-sub-moa-mini-14/</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:38:33 +1300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: komrad</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/18/accuracy-systems-sub-moa-mini-14/#comment-13948</link>
		<dc:creator>komrad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 22:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/18/accuracy-systems-sub-moa-mini-14/#comment-13948</guid>
		<description>A mini-14 is NOT a target rifle. It is a plinking and self defense gun. If you really need a target gun then buy a bolt action in a target caliber.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A mini-14 is NOT a target rifle. It is a plinking and self defense gun. If you really need a target gun then buy a bolt action in a target caliber.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/18/accuracy-systems-sub-moa-mini-14/#comment-1725</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 22:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/18/accuracy-systems-sub-moa-mini-14/#comment-1725</guid>
		<description>That interesting. Thanks Jay. 

I have often thought about a scaled down m14. What would be even better would be a scaled up M1 carbine :) An M1 in 5.56 or 6.8 would be great!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That interesting. Thanks Jay. </p>
<p>I have often thought about a scaled down m14. What would be even better would be a scaled up M1 carbine <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  An M1 in 5.56 or 6.8 would be great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay.Mac</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/18/accuracy-systems-sub-moa-mini-14/#comment-1724</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay.Mac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/18/accuracy-systems-sub-moa-mini-14/#comment-1724</guid>
		<description>I did stumble across a link at a gun forum (forget which one now) where a guy had simply made his own Accu-Strut- using aluminium clamps to maximise the heat draw from the barrel and with a Surefire flashlight in place of the bar.

As Ruger seems unable to grasp the potential of a fixed Mini-14, I keep hoping that Springfield Armory will- and bring out a scaled down M1A in 5.56mm or 6.5 Grendel (and a Mini-Garand to go with them). Classic firearms in a slightly smaller package firing cheaper and more controllable ammo. What&#039;s not to like?

I&#039;ve got to say that I think a Springer SOCOM in 5.56mm would be a good seller.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did stumble across a link at a gun forum (forget which one now) where a guy had simply made his own Accu-Strut- using aluminium clamps to maximise the heat draw from the barrel and with a Surefire flashlight in place of the bar.</p>
<p>As Ruger seems unable to grasp the potential of a fixed Mini-14, I keep hoping that Springfield Armory will- and bring out a scaled down M1A in 5.56mm or 6.5 Grendel (and a Mini-Garand to go with them). Classic firearms in a slightly smaller package firing cheaper and more controllable ammo. What&#8217;s not to like?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got to say that I think a Springer SOCOM in 5.56mm would be a good seller.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/18/accuracy-systems-sub-moa-mini-14/#comment-1720</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 08:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/18/accuracy-systems-sub-moa-mini-14/#comment-1720</guid>
		<description>I agree with you 100%. 

The same goes for the 10/22. Sure you can customize it, but why not make it more accurate out of the box. A lightened trigger and removal of the barrel band would go a long way.

Thanks for that Accu-Strut link. An interesting product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you 100%. </p>
<p>The same goes for the 10/22. Sure you can customize it, but why not make it more accurate out of the box. A lightened trigger and removal of the barrel band would go a long way.</p>
<p>Thanks for that Accu-Strut link. An interesting product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay.Mac</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/18/accuracy-systems-sub-moa-mini-14/#comment-1712</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay.Mac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 13:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/18/accuracy-systems-sub-moa-mini-14/#comment-1712</guid>
		<description>It amazes me that Ruger dropped the ball on the Mini-14; by offering it with a decent barrel they could have sewn up the civilian/LEO market long before the AR-15 became the rifle of choice for shooters. It already has the Garand action to provide fool-proof reliability and if it had built a reputation as an accurate weapon to boot, shooters would have come out in droves for it. And I suspect that the Troy Industries style of stocks for the big brother M14 would have been on the market and commonplace long before now.

As it is, Ruger still doesn&#039;t seem to get it- the sliding barrel weight seems to me to be a shoddy, second-hand solution to the problem. I hear that they have a kind of wizard called an engineer these days who are able to fix the problems that mechanical devices have. Perhaps Ruger should employ one or two of them?

BTW, there&#039;s an outfit called Accu-Strut who make a cheaper alternative to the solution- essentially two barrel clamps joined by a bar of metal. It draws heat away from the barrel and adds stiffness. 

http://www.accu-strut.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It amazes me that Ruger dropped the ball on the Mini-14; by offering it with a decent barrel they could have sewn up the civilian/LEO market long before the AR-15 became the rifle of choice for shooters. It already has the Garand action to provide fool-proof reliability and if it had built a reputation as an accurate weapon to boot, shooters would have come out in droves for it. And I suspect that the Troy Industries style of stocks for the big brother M14 would have been on the market and commonplace long before now.</p>
<p>As it is, Ruger still doesn&#8217;t seem to get it- the sliding barrel weight seems to me to be a shoddy, second-hand solution to the problem. I hear that they have a kind of wizard called an engineer these days who are able to fix the problems that mechanical devices have. Perhaps Ruger should employ one or two of them?</p>
<p>BTW, there&#8217;s an outfit called Accu-Strut who make a cheaper alternative to the solution- essentially two barrel clamps joined by a bar of metal. It draws heat away from the barrel and adds stiffness. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.accu-strut.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.accu-strut.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
