Ruger 77/22 rifle review

Shooting Times (UK) has reviewed the .22 Ruger 77/22 rifle

Priced towards the upper end of the rimfire scale, the M77/22 still gives excellent value for money. Build quality is good, as is the accuracy and reliability in the test.

With the options of stainless and synthetic designs, this rifle gives a genuinely good choice for any rimfire shooter – it has the feel of a centrefire rifle but the weight of a light sporter. Supplied with 1in dedicated scope mounts, it is a definite winner as is the pre-threaded barrel, essential on a sporting rimfire these days.

I briefly looked at getting the synthetic model. I decided it was not worth the price. In my opinion for the price it should include an adjustable trigger and free floating barrel.

Ruger 77.22-1

Ruger 77/22-R

Related Posts

Steve Mar 6th 2008 rifles, rimfire Tags: , , , , , 8 Comments

8 Responses to “Ruger 77/22 rifle review”

  1. Tom Priceon 29 Dec 2008 at 2:28 am link comment

    I have a 77/22 stainless with synthetic stock. The workmanship and design are all very good. However I cannot get around the heavy trigger pull. You can pick up the cocked gun with the trigger! That is the way it is designed, and the pull cannot be changed without some after market trigger kit or a gunsmith. Selling a fairly expensive rifle with such a heavy trigger pull is irresponsible. I am sure the attorneys at Ruger are happy with the gun– it is safe–, but as a shooter, I am greatly disappointed. I understand from internet blogs that this is not the only instance of poor triggers from Ruger. Ruger needs to get their attorneys out of the firearms design department and let shooters have a say.

    I know I can fix the gun with a kit, but why should I? I intended to buy a good shooter and I was willing to pay for it. Of course Ruger would be happy for me to modify the gun and void the warranty and let them off the hook for consequential damage (the attorneys again). Maybe that was the intent all along: sell a gun that is not shootable and force the consumer to modify it and make the legal department happy.

    I will probably get rid of the rifle and buy one (probably less expensive) with a decent trigger.

  2. Ryanon 19 Feb 2009 at 5:16 am link comment

    Ruger designed the 77/22 to be consistant with its other rifles so it could be a practice gun for the off-season. When you pick up a ruger 77/22 it will feel the same as if it were a 30-06, 308 or 270. The trigger pull is the result of this consistancy and many shooters who are used to ruger firearms appreciate it. Those who already use ruger and do not like the trigger pull usually take it to a gunsmith.

  3. Thoraxon 31 Mar 2009 at 1:22 pm link comment

    I also have the Ruger “all weather” stainless/synthetic 77/22.

    I have one of the very first that came off the line, it’s about 20 years old now.
    It took me all of 30 minutes to smooth and lighten the trigger with a 1200 grit stone. I have it at 2.5 lbs, and very very crisp. It’s unreal accurate, like shooting a laser.
    I’ve probably put over 15000 rounds (not a typo) through it.
    It likes CCI mini-mag ammo best, even better than the high dollar match ammo.
    I have a Leupold 3-9x on it in the factory rings.

    On any day, I will gladly shoot head to head with any Anschutz owner out there.
    I won’t lose.

  4. Rickon 29 Jun 2009 at 8:02 am link comment

    I would love to have one of these Rifles, just too many bills right now.
    But one day I will own one.
    I use a .22 Rifle for Squirrel hunting, and at night for Coon hunting with Hounds. This one would be great, with a Sling, and a Leupold 4x Rimfire scope on it.

  5. Garyon 15 Jul 2009 at 1:41 am link comment

    There are two 77/22s in my family, an All-Weather I purchased for myself back in the 80’s and a heavy barrel stainless I bought for my older son when he graduated from high school.
    The All-Weather came with a light, crisp pull, right out of the box. I never really tested it very thoroughly for accuracy, as I bought it for its durability and light weight. I gave it to my younger son some years back, and he put a Gilmore red dot on it, which of course is no good for evaluating its potential. I hope to pick up a good used one with iron sights some day for myself.
    The heavy barreled model had a terrible trigger, but I installed a Timney replacement sear (about $35) and now it’s light and crisp. It’s an easy job and well worth the effort. This gun shoots excellent groups (in the 1/2 inch range) with several loads, even some of the bargain stuff. I just bought some Wolf Extra Match and will try that out soon. This is probably the best bolt gun going for the tinkerer, considering that you can swap out barrels with ease, allowing you to shoot .17HM2 and Aguila SSS loads.

  6. Timon 27 Sep 2009 at 4:07 am link comment

    Look at it this way it is how they keep prices lower by staying out of court. Ruger does not like this any more than you It cost no more to make a 2lb trigger than a 7lb.Buy this gun and have fun improving the trigger its easy!!

  7. Wayneon 22 Oct 2009 at 4:50 am link comment

    I just purchaced a 77/22, with a 3×9 Nikon Scope. I haven’t shot it yet, but may on the weekend. Nice looking and feeling rifle. Can’t wait.

  8. Terryon 15 Nov 2009 at 10:48 am link comment

    I have polished out my 77 22 triger and it shoots great. As a matter of fact it will out shoot my CZ 452 FS easly. They both like CCI Mine Mags.

Leave a Comment

Comment Policy: I reserve the right to remove comments at my discretion. Think of comment threads like a dinner party at someone's house. If you make the party unpleasant for others or me, you won't be invited back. I am happy to tolerate a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but I'm not going to tolerate nastiness, rudeness, trolling, vitriol, or excessive snarkiness toward the author(s) or other commenters. You may make your case passionately, but civility is expected. Please stay on topic and respect the technical nature of this blog.
Spam Filtering: To avoid spam, comments are filtered using Akismet and then manually approved. Do not be alarmed if you comment does not appear instantly. I do not check the spam folder more than once per day.