<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Iraq M16 biometric tracing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/01/iraq-m16-biometric-tracing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/01/iraq-m16-biometric-tracing/</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/01/iraq-m16-biometric-tracing/#comment-2400</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 12:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/01/iraq-m16-biometric-tracing/#comment-2400</guid>
		<description>Hi InfidelTababa, thanks for your insight. 

I mostly agree with you, but I don't think that they will ever be able to assume M16 = friendly. Iran produces a clone of the Chinese AR-15 clone, these clones will probably make their way to the insurgents for use in fake checkpoints etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi InfidelTababa, thanks for your insight. </p>
<p>I mostly agree with you, but I don&#8217;t think that they will ever be able to assume M16 = friendly. Iran produces a clone of the Chinese AR-15 clone, these clones will probably make their way to the insurgents for use in fake checkpoints etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: InfidelTababa</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/01/iraq-m16-biometric-tracing/#comment-2399</link>
		<dc:creator>InfidelTababa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/01/iraq-m16-biometric-tracing/#comment-2399</guid>
		<description>Everyone is focusing on the functional arguments of the M-16 Series. These points are all well known and have been discussed to death. There is a  much simpler and more practical implication to this move.  First let me establish my BS rating.  I have been in Iraq for nearly 5 years.  I spent several years in the field, and now I am a mentor at a tier one Iraqi training unit. 

Many of the rank and file Iraqi Army and Police wear 2 hats.  Army by day, insurgent by night, and it is an even bet that NEITHER of his two families knows about the other. The AK is so ubiquitous in this culture, seeing one is meaningless, taking his AK and giving him an M-16 "outs" him to everyone who sees it. It makes it much easier for us to tell good guys from bad guys.

I suggested pinning gold paper stars to their clothes, but I guess that was tried once before and people got pretty touchy about it. 

An Iraqi army uniform is pretty easy to come by if you want to run a fake checkpoint for carjackings and shakedowns.  An M-16 is much harder.  Once we can say 100% of the Iraqi army is packing the Mattel toy rifle people have an instant visual cue that the guys ahead are phonies.  This also applies to our guys.  Increasingly US soldiers are operating side by side with Iraqis.  At a couple hundred yards viewed through NVGs that distinctive profile is a  big help in deciding what to do.  Now when you see that classic AK image, you dont have to pause to check for friendlies in the area.  Skulking around at night+AK in hand=72 Virgins.

Yes, follow the money.  That is usually the answer.  For a second here forget about the money involved in ammo contracts.  This move means we can CUT OFF ammo.  As long as the Iraqis use 7.62x39 in a State sponsored capacity we have to allow it to exist.  This enables us to take that card off the table by eliminating any stockpiles we find as obsolete, or even better, tracing them straight to insurgents.

You could also add black ammo into the mix, but that is another conversation.

Yes biometrics adds an additional layer of tracking should one of these guns go missing, but that is a secondary effort.  You can accomplish the same thing with morning formation.  Everyone who is not holding an M-16 please step into the office.  Done.  Also one of the M-16 family traits is an insatiable need to be cleaned.  It will not be long before any rifle that falls out becomes deadlined because Iraqis, used to AK's, who have not been trained in it's care and maintenance will be unable to keep it running.  You know what these guys Everyone is focusing on the functional arguments of the M-16 Series. These points are all well known and have been discussed to death. There is a  much simpler and more practical implication to this move.  First let me establish my BS rating.  I have been in Iraq for nearly 5 years.  I spent several years in the field, and now I am a mentor at a tier one Iraqi training unit. 

Many of the rank and file Iraqi Army and Police wear 2 hats.  Army by day, insurgent by night, and it is an even bet that NEITHER of his two families knows about the other. The AK is so ubiquitous in this culture, seeing one is meaningless, taking his AK and giving him an M-16 "outs" him to everyone who sees it. It makes it much easier for us to tell good guys from bad guys.

I suggested pinning gold paper stars to their clothes, but I guess that was tried once before and people got pretty touchy about it. 

An Iraqi army uniform is pretty easy to come by if you want to run a fake checkpoint for carjackings and shakedowns.  An M-16 is much harder.  Once we can say 100% of the Iraqi army is packing the Mattel toy rifle people have an instant visual cue that the guys ahead are phonies.  This also applies to our guys.  Increasingly US soldiers are operating side by side with Iraqis.  At a couple hundred yards viewed through NVGs that distinctive profile is a  big help in deciding what to do.  Now when you see that classic AK image, you dont have to pause to check for friendlies in the area.  Skulking around at night+AK in hand=72 Virgins.

Yes, follow the money.  That is usually the answer.  For a second here forget about the money involved in ammo contracts.  This move means we can CUT OFF ammo.  As long as the Iraqis use 7.62x39 in a State sponsored capacity we have to allow it to exist.  This enables us to take that card off the table by eliminating any stockpiles we find as obsolete, or even better, tracing them straight to insurgents.

You could also add black ammo into the mix, but that is another conversation.

Yes biometrics adds an additional layer of tracking should one of these guns go missing, but that is a secondary effort.  You can accomplish the same thing with morning formation.  Everyone who is not holding an M-16 please step into the office.  Done.  Also one of the M-16 family traits is an insatiable need to be cleaned.  It will not be long before any rifle that falls out becomes deadlined because Iraqis, used to AK's, who have not been trained in it's care and maintenance will be unable to keep it running.  You know what these desert dwellers call an M-16 that hasn't been cleaned in a while?  Nothing. They are dead because it wouldn't fire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone is focusing on the functional arguments of the M-16 Series. These points are all well known and have been discussed to death. There is a  much simpler and more practical implication to this move.  First let me establish my BS rating.  I have been in Iraq for nearly 5 years.  I spent several years in the field, and now I am a mentor at a tier one Iraqi training unit. </p>
<p>Many of the rank and file Iraqi Army and Police wear 2 hats.  Army by day, insurgent by night, and it is an even bet that NEITHER of his two families knows about the other. The AK is so ubiquitous in this culture, seeing one is meaningless, taking his AK and giving him an M-16 &#8220;outs&#8221; him to everyone who sees it. It makes it much easier for us to tell good guys from bad guys.</p>
<p>I suggested pinning gold paper stars to their clothes, but I guess that was tried once before and people got pretty touchy about it. </p>
<p>An Iraqi army uniform is pretty easy to come by if you want to run a fake checkpoint for carjackings and shakedowns.  An M-16 is much harder.  Once we can say 100% of the Iraqi army is packing the Mattel toy rifle people have an instant visual cue that the guys ahead are phonies.  This also applies to our guys.  Increasingly US soldiers are operating side by side with Iraqis.  At a couple hundred yards viewed through NVGs that distinctive profile is a  big help in deciding what to do.  Now when you see that classic AK image, you dont have to pause to check for friendlies in the area.  Skulking around at night+AK in hand=72 Virgins.</p>
<p>Yes, follow the money.  That is usually the answer.  For a second here forget about the money involved in ammo contracts.  This move means we can CUT OFF ammo.  As long as the Iraqis use 7.62&#215;39 in a State sponsored capacity we have to allow it to exist.  This enables us to take that card off the table by eliminating any stockpiles we find as obsolete, or even better, tracing them straight to insurgents.</p>
<p>You could also add black ammo into the mix, but that is another conversation.</p>
<p>Yes biometrics adds an additional layer of tracking should one of these guns go missing, but that is a secondary effort.  You can accomplish the same thing with morning formation.  Everyone who is not holding an M-16 please step into the office.  Done.  Also one of the M-16 family traits is an insatiable need to be cleaned.  It will not be long before any rifle that falls out becomes deadlined because Iraqis, used to AK&#8217;s, who have not been trained in it&#8217;s care and maintenance will be unable to keep it running.  You know what these guys Everyone is focusing on the functional arguments of the M-16 Series. These points are all well known and have been discussed to death. There is a  much simpler and more practical implication to this move.  First let me establish my BS rating.  I have been in Iraq for nearly 5 years.  I spent several years in the field, and now I am a mentor at a tier one Iraqi training unit. </p>
<p>Many of the rank and file Iraqi Army and Police wear 2 hats.  Army by day, insurgent by night, and it is an even bet that NEITHER of his two families knows about the other. The AK is so ubiquitous in this culture, seeing one is meaningless, taking his AK and giving him an M-16 &#8220;outs&#8221; him to everyone who sees it. It makes it much easier for us to tell good guys from bad guys.</p>
<p>I suggested pinning gold paper stars to their clothes, but I guess that was tried once before and people got pretty touchy about it. </p>
<p>An Iraqi army uniform is pretty easy to come by if you want to run a fake checkpoint for carjackings and shakedowns.  An M-16 is much harder.  Once we can say 100% of the Iraqi army is packing the Mattel toy rifle people have an instant visual cue that the guys ahead are phonies.  This also applies to our guys.  Increasingly US soldiers are operating side by side with Iraqis.  At a couple hundred yards viewed through NVGs that distinctive profile is a  big help in deciding what to do.  Now when you see that classic AK image, you dont have to pause to check for friendlies in the area.  Skulking around at night+AK in hand=72 Virgins.</p>
<p>Yes, follow the money.  That is usually the answer.  For a second here forget about the money involved in ammo contracts.  This move means we can CUT OFF ammo.  As long as the Iraqis use 7.62&#215;39 in a State sponsored capacity we have to allow it to exist.  This enables us to take that card off the table by eliminating any stockpiles we find as obsolete, or even better, tracing them straight to insurgents.</p>
<p>You could also add black ammo into the mix, but that is another conversation.</p>
<p>Yes biometrics adds an additional layer of tracking should one of these guns go missing, but that is a secondary effort.  You can accomplish the same thing with morning formation.  Everyone who is not holding an M-16 please step into the office.  Done.  Also one of the M-16 family traits is an insatiable need to be cleaned.  It will not be long before any rifle that falls out becomes deadlined because Iraqis, used to AK&#8217;s, who have not been trained in it&#8217;s care and maintenance will be unable to keep it running.  You know what these desert dwellers call an M-16 that hasn&#8217;t been cleaned in a while?  Nothing. They are dead because it wouldn&#8217;t fire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/01/iraq-m16-biometric-tracing/#comment-1608</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 01:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/01/iraq-m16-biometric-tracing/#comment-1608</guid>
		<description>I often wonder what the behind-the-scene-politics are of not providing a gas piston upgrade to the existing M16/M4s in service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I often wonder what the behind-the-scene-politics are of not providing a gas piston upgrade to the existing M16/M4s in service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/01/iraq-m16-biometric-tracing/#comment-1604</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 01:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/01/iraq-m16-biometric-tracing/#comment-1604</guid>
		<description>Still has the same two fundamental flaws: the gas action dumps carbon and heat into the action resulting in jams, and the wet lubricant sticks particles to the contact point in the action resulting in jams. its a terrible choice for a desert environment with a lot of dust and without near religious amounts of maintenance, will jam constantly.

There are fixes to both problems but we arent applying them to ours or the IA's. Supporting the troops my a-s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still has the same two fundamental flaws: the gas action dumps carbon and heat into the action resulting in jams, and the wet lubricant sticks particles to the contact point in the action resulting in jams. its a terrible choice for a desert environment with a lot of dust and without near religious amounts of maintenance, will jam constantly.</p>
<p>There are fixes to both problems but we arent applying them to ours or the IA&#8217;s. Supporting the troops my a-s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
