<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Boberg XR9: High Tech Pocket Pistol</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/07/boberg-xr9-high-tech-pocket-pistol/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/07/boberg-xr9-high-tech-pocket-pistol/</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:18:29 +1300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tommy dawson</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/07/boberg-xr9-high-tech-pocket-pistol/#comment-17271</link>
		<dc:creator>tommy dawson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 23:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/07/boberg-xr9-high-tech-pocket-pistol/#comment-17271</guid>
		<description>I would like to have a basic engineering drawing of the XR9.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to have a basic engineering drawing of the XR9.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dallas</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/07/boberg-xr9-high-tech-pocket-pistol/#comment-9831</link>
		<dc:creator>Dallas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 19:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/07/boberg-xr9-high-tech-pocket-pistol/#comment-9831</guid>
		<description>I think is is great, but I can see where the problems will lie. As much as conventional systems have problems feeding different types of ammo and different loadings, I imagine this would have even more problems, especially since it will likely require a shorter COAL. The weak/limp wrist issue can be negated by a lighter spring, just as it is in lower pressure/power catridges. As for the timing issue, if sufficient room is allowed so that the timing can accomodate the lowest and highest power loadings, it shouldn&#039;t have the timing problems I suppose Crypto is alluding to in the M2. This is the first I&#039;ve ever heard of this firearm and so we&#039;ll see hwere the company goes from here. Looks pretty novel to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think is is great, but I can see where the problems will lie. As much as conventional systems have problems feeding different types of ammo and different loadings, I imagine this would have even more problems, especially since it will likely require a shorter COAL. The weak/limp wrist issue can be negated by a lighter spring, just as it is in lower pressure/power catridges. As for the timing issue, if sufficient room is allowed so that the timing can accomodate the lowest and highest power loadings, it shouldn&#8217;t have the timing problems I suppose Crypto is alluding to in the M2. This is the first I&#8217;ve ever heard of this firearm and so we&#8217;ll see hwere the company goes from here. Looks pretty novel to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/07/boberg-xr9-high-tech-pocket-pistol/#comment-7991</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/07/boberg-xr9-high-tech-pocket-pistol/#comment-7991</guid>
		<description>Wheather or not it works, what&#039;s the point? Yes the chanber has been moved back significantly, but it&#039;s also devoloped this huge growth on the back end. Overall length seems about the same for such a huge increase in complexity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wheather or not it works, what&#8217;s the point? Yes the chanber has been moved back significantly, but it&#8217;s also devoloped this huge growth on the back end. Overall length seems about the same for such a huge increase in complexity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brente</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/07/boberg-xr9-high-tech-pocket-pistol/#comment-7939</link>
		<dc:creator>Brente</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/07/boberg-xr9-high-tech-pocket-pistol/#comment-7939</guid>
		<description>It seems to me that the lifting mechanism is the weak link.  Too many moving parts to be totally reliable. The backward and then forward motion of the bullet seems to me that the gun will jam more often than a conventional automatic, especially from a shooter with a limp or weak wrist.

A conventional auto just pushes the bullet up and the slide slams it home.  Jams occur with the same wrist weakness but are limited to the barrel and slide making it easy to clear a jam.  If this happens because of the lifting mech, it would seem that the gun would need to be dismantled.

You also have an extra spring for the lifting mech as opposed to a genuine blowback design.  Springs tend to be problem areas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that the lifting mechanism is the weak link.  Too many moving parts to be totally reliable. The backward and then forward motion of the bullet seems to me that the gun will jam more often than a conventional automatic, especially from a shooter with a limp or weak wrist.</p>
<p>A conventional auto just pushes the bullet up and the slide slams it home.  Jams occur with the same wrist weakness but are limited to the barrel and slide making it easy to clear a jam.  If this happens because of the lifting mech, it would seem that the gun would need to be dismantled.</p>
<p>You also have an extra spring for the lifting mech as opposed to a genuine blowback design.  Springs tend to be problem areas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crypto</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/07/boberg-xr9-high-tech-pocket-pistol/#comment-6259</link>
		<dc:creator>Crypto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 19:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/07/boberg-xr9-high-tech-pocket-pistol/#comment-6259</guid>
		<description>This action reminds me of a flipped-over M2 machine gun. I wonder if it&#039;s going to have chronic headspace and timing issues too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This action reminds me of a flipped-over M2 machine gun. I wonder if it&#8217;s going to have chronic headspace and timing issues too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the raj</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/07/boberg-xr9-high-tech-pocket-pistol/#comment-5030</link>
		<dc:creator>the raj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/07/boberg-xr9-high-tech-pocket-pistol/#comment-5030</guid>
		<description>While I think it will take many years of unfettered ahndgun dvelopment to make this a more common design trait, this is a potential game-changer, especially for small pistols.  Getting full-size performance out of a compact gun means better expansion with hollow-points.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I think it will take many years of unfettered ahndgun dvelopment to make this a more common design trait, this is a potential game-changer, especially for small pistols.  Getting full-size performance out of a compact gun means better expansion with hollow-points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/07/boberg-xr9-high-tech-pocket-pistol/#comment-4769</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 20:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/07/boberg-xr9-high-tech-pocket-pistol/#comment-4769</guid>
		<description>Ooh, that looks &lt;i&gt;nice!&lt;/i&gt; I wonder what the real-life reliability is like, though?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooh, that looks <i>nice!</i> I wonder what the real-life reliability is like, though?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/07/boberg-xr9-high-tech-pocket-pistol/#comment-2606</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/07/boberg-xr9-high-tech-pocket-pistol/#comment-2606</guid>
		<description>looks like a big peice of crap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>looks like a big peice of crap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mars pistol: The first pistol with magazine located under the chamber. &#124; The Firearm Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/07/boberg-xr9-high-tech-pocket-pistol/#comment-1510</link>
		<dc:creator>Mars pistol: The first pistol with magazine located under the chamber. &#124; The Firearm Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/07/boberg-xr9-high-tech-pocket-pistol/#comment-1510</guid>
		<description>[...] recently wrote about the new Boberg XR9 pistol which features the magazine beneath the chamber. Dr. StrangeGun discovered that the Gabbett-Fairfax [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recently wrote about the new Boberg XR9 pistol which features the magazine beneath the chamber. Dr. StrangeGun discovered that the Gabbett-Fairfax [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
