Boberg XR9: High Tech Pocket Pistol

The XR9 is a prototype 9mm pocket pistol by Boberg Engineering. What makes it special is that the magazine located directly under the chamber. This allows it to have a full size barrel (4.2”). Think of it as a bullpup equivalent in a pistol (not the best analogy but you get the idea)!

Xr9-Front1
What a beautiful looking pistol

Xr9-My Hand
Standard black frame, Gen II prototype

The Boberg feed mechanism differs from traditional feed mechanisms in that it draws the cartridge backward from the magazine (see video).

What is not obvious from this view or the video is the rendundancy of the mechanism. The lifting device, consisting of the lifting linkage and the ramp, imparts a kinematically balanced motion to the cartridge as it is lifted. This is important because the cartridge is accelerated rearward an upwards of 2000 g’s. Any impact on the cartridge by the ramp is absorbed by the resiliency of the ramp. This combination, along with containment of the case flange, is sufficient to feed cartridges; however, a top stop is added to prevent any further upward motion of the cartridge.

Even a poorly designed lift mechanism would feed cartridges somewhat reliably when using the top stop alone; however, the Boberg XR9 uses both kinematic balance and the top stop to provide complete and redundant control over the cartridge as it is picked from the magazine, lifted to be in-line with the barrel, and placed into the chamber.

Cross Sec

The video:

Specs:

Caliber: 9mm
Length: 5.8”
Height: 4.2”
Width: 0.95”
Weight: 19.5 oz with magazine
Barrel Length: 4.2”
Capacity: 7+1
Action: Rotating-Barrel Locked-Breech
Sights: Dovetail windage, 5.1” radius
Trigger Pull: 6.5 lb DAO
Safeties: 3

It will be very interesting to see what becomes of this pistol.

More info here.

Hat Tip: Ahab

UPDATE: The pistol is expected in 2009.

Related Posts

Steve Feb 7th 2008 handguns Tags: , , , , , , , 9 Comments

9 Responses to “Boberg XR9: High Tech Pocket Pistol”

  1. [...] recently wrote about the new Boberg XR9 pistol which features the magazine beneath the chamber. Dr. StrangeGun discovered that the Gabbett-Fairfax [...]

  2. steveon 14 Aug 2008 at 4:12 am link comment

    looks like a big peice of crap.

  3. Tonyon 11 Jan 2009 at 9:35 am link comment

    Ooh, that looks nice! I wonder what the real-life reliability is like, though?

  4. the rajon 17 Jan 2009 at 4:02 am link comment

    While I think it will take many years of unfettered ahndgun dvelopment to make this a more common design trait, this is a potential game-changer, especially for small pistols. Getting full-size performance out of a compact gun means better expansion with hollow-points.

  5. Cryptoon 12 Feb 2009 at 8:58 am link comment

    This action reminds me of a flipped-over M2 machine gun. I wonder if it’s going to have chronic headspace and timing issues too?

  6. Brenteon 26 Mar 2009 at 6:34 am link comment

    It seems to me that the lifting mechanism is the weak link. Too many moving parts to be totally reliable. The backward and then forward motion of the bullet seems to me that the gun will jam more often than a conventional automatic, especially from a shooter with a limp or weak wrist.

    A conventional auto just pushes the bullet up and the slide slams it home. Jams occur with the same wrist weakness but are limited to the barrel and slide making it easy to clear a jam. If this happens because of the lifting mech, it would seem that the gun would need to be dismantled.

    You also have an extra spring for the lifting mech as opposed to a genuine blowback design. Springs tend to be problem areas

  7. Bobon 26 Mar 2009 at 10:44 pm link comment

    Wheather or not it works, what’s the point? Yes the chanber has been moved back significantly, but it’s also devoloped this huge growth on the back end. Overall length seems about the same for such a huge increase in complexity.

  8. Dallason 23 May 2009 at 7:20 am link comment

    I think is is great, but I can see where the problems will lie. As much as conventional systems have problems feeding different types of ammo and different loadings, I imagine this would have even more problems, especially since it will likely require a shorter COAL. The weak/limp wrist issue can be negated by a lighter spring, just as it is in lower pressure/power catridges. As for the timing issue, if sufficient room is allowed so that the timing can accomodate the lowest and highest power loadings, it shouldn’t have the timing problems I suppose Crypto is alluding to in the M2. This is the first I’ve ever heard of this firearm and so we’ll see hwere the company goes from here. Looks pretty novel to me.

  9. tommy dawsonon 29 Oct 2009 at 11:44 am link comment

    I would like to have a basic engineering drawing of the XR9.

Leave a Comment

Comment Policy: I reserve the right to remove comments at my discretion. Think of comment threads like a dinner party at someone's house. If you make the party unpleasant for others or me, you won't be invited back. I am happy to tolerate a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but I'm not going to tolerate nastiness, rudeness, trolling, vitriol, or excessive snarkiness toward the author(s) or other commenters. You may make your case passionately, but civility is expected. Please stay on topic and respect the technical nature of this blog.
Spam Filtering: To avoid spam, comments are filtered using Akismet and then manually approved. Do not be alarmed if you comment does not appear instantly. I do not check the spam folder more than once per day.