<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FNAR 7.62&#215;51mm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:18:29 +1300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sean Ingram</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-18332</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Ingram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-18332</guid>
		<description>I went to the range to shoot mine yesterday and it&#039;s shooting 2-2.5 inch groups at 100 yards for me using Winchester 150 grain SPs. I know I could probably improve this but it&#039;s good enough for deer season opening gun day over in Alabama this weekend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went to the range to shoot mine yesterday and it&#8217;s shooting 2-2.5 inch groups at 100 yards for me using Winchester 150 grain SPs. I know I could probably improve this but it&#8217;s good enough for deer season opening gun day over in Alabama this weekend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Cheek</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-17526</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Cheek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 20:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-17526</guid>
		<description>Hunting ammo performance report - Reference my 13 Oct 2009 Range Report.

Another good performer found, tested at the range yesterday:

Win Match 180 gr. Nosler Accubond by Black Hills.
Performed about the same as the Federal 165 gr Sierra Game King.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hunting ammo performance report &#8211; Reference my 13 Oct 2009 Range Report.</p>
<p>Another good performer found, tested at the range yesterday:</p>
<p>Win Match 180 gr. Nosler Accubond by Black Hills.<br />
Performed about the same as the Federal 165 gr Sierra Game King.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-17156</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-17156</guid>
		<description>Go to the  winchester website and check out  their new SXAR rifle.
Looks just like the  FNAR with camo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go to the  winchester website and check out  their new SXAR rifle.<br />
Looks just like the  FNAR with camo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Cheek</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-17141</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Cheek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 03:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-17141</guid>
		<description>To one question, is it a significant upgrade to a custom bolt-action .30-06 ?  Well, it&#039;s a whole different animal.

First - it&#039;s a semi-auto rifle with 10 and 20 round magazines available.  But it&#039;s very accurate with certain ammunition.  However, the trigger is only average when compared to match triggers found in a custom rifle used for precision shooting.

Second - IMO, the FNAR is better suited for as a fighting rifle, for defense against crowds of charging zombies, or getting into a herd of feral hogs, or taking down medium-to-large game, than for shooting poor little pd&#039;s.

Third - the ammo selection for a .308 is much more limited than for what may be the most versatile rifle in history with regard to the ammo selection available for it: the .30-06.  Ammo is available for it to shoot anything from little varmints in West Texas to heavy game in Africa.

Fourth - the .308 is not typically reknown as a flat-shooting round.  There are many rifles in a variety of calibers available to you that shoot cheaper and smaller bullets with greater speed and with better, flatter ballistics - all of which may be more suitable for varmints.  Just a few are the .17, .22-250, .223, .25-06 and many more.  You&#039;ll need to research what your needs are.

Enjoy Tech and keep carrying that card!  Hope this helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To one question, is it a significant upgrade to a custom bolt-action .30-06 ?  Well, it&#8217;s a whole different animal.</p>
<p>First &#8211; it&#8217;s a semi-auto rifle with 10 and 20 round magazines available.  But it&#8217;s very accurate with certain ammunition.  However, the trigger is only average when compared to match triggers found in a custom rifle used for precision shooting.</p>
<p>Second &#8211; IMO, the FNAR is better suited for as a fighting rifle, for defense against crowds of charging zombies, or getting into a herd of feral hogs, or taking down medium-to-large game, than for shooting poor little pd&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Third &#8211; the ammo selection for a .308 is much more limited than for what may be the most versatile rifle in history with regard to the ammo selection available for it: the .30-06.  Ammo is available for it to shoot anything from little varmints in West Texas to heavy game in Africa.</p>
<p>Fourth &#8211; the .308 is not typically reknown as a flat-shooting round.  There are many rifles in a variety of calibers available to you that shoot cheaper and smaller bullets with greater speed and with better, flatter ballistics &#8211; all of which may be more suitable for varmints.  Just a few are the .17, .22-250, .223, .25-06 and many more.  You&#8217;ll need to research what your needs are.</p>
<p>Enjoy Tech and keep carrying that card!  Hope this helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garrett</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-17122</link>
		<dc:creator>Garrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-17122</guid>
		<description>Just wondering. Has the price dropped on these bad boys at all? I&#039;m going to be turning 18 soon and i was wondering if my father could afford to buy me one of these. And is it a significant upgrade to a .270 WBY or a custom bolt action 30-06? Im going to go to Texas Tech out in Lubbock, Texas, and i have to have SOMETHING to shoot prairie dogs with ;). also, im a card carrying life member of the NRA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wondering. Has the price dropped on these bad boys at all? I&#8217;m going to be turning 18 soon and i was wondering if my father could afford to buy me one of these. And is it a significant upgrade to a .270 WBY or a custom bolt action 30-06? Im going to go to Texas Tech out in Lubbock, Texas, and i have to have SOMETHING to shoot prairie dogs with <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> . also, im a card carrying life member of the NRA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JEFF EDGECOMB</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-16165</link>
		<dc:creator>JEFF EDGECOMB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 06:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-16165</guid>
		<description>it is a fn fnar .308 heavy 
awsom rifle 
i have shot 500 rnds
100 m 200 m 400 m
win match 168 g
Buffalo bore awsom / best
lupia reloads great
and black hills awsom / best
and 762x51 nato good
and match reloads verry good
all fed and shot well
good moa from all jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it is a fn fnar .308 heavy<br />
awsom rifle<br />
i have shot 500 rnds<br />
100 m 200 m 400 m<br />
win match 168 g<br />
Buffalo bore awsom / best<br />
lupia reloads great<br />
and black hills awsom / best<br />
and 762&#215;51 nato good<br />
and match reloads verry good<br />
all fed and shot well<br />
good moa from all jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-16003</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 20:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-16003</guid>
		<description>Terry, thanks for the range report.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terry, thanks for the range report.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Cheek</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-15985</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Cheek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-15985</guid>
		<description>This is &quot;a day-after the range&quot; followup to my post of 28 Sep 2009.

As said, I have had and continue to have excellent results with the 175 gr Buffalo Bore match ammo.
I also have had surprisingly good results with the cheap Federal blue-box 150 gr soft points which I used while sighting-in and breaking-in the rifle.

Yesterday, I tried Winchester&#039;s Supreme Ballistic Silver Tips in 168 gr and 150 gr.  These are boat-tail nosler-point bullets.
They sprayed all over the place at 100 and 200 yards.  Very erratic, not even real groups - way over 1 moa of spread from point of aim.  The barrel was clean. 

This was an unpleasant surprise for me, since I have gotten superior results over the years with the same type of ammo in Win. 270, both 130 gr and 140 gr.  Yes, it&#039;s a completely different rifle and is a single-shot bolt action.

However, at the end of the day, I tried another type in the FNAR:  Federal&#039;s Premium 165 gr Sierra Game King provided acceptable results.  Groups of 5 at 100 and 200 yards were all within 1 MOA of the POA, usually 3 of the 5 within 1/2 MOA.  And that was when I was tired.  Would expect better results if rested.

For now, it looks as if that will be my hunting ammo for this season.  Looking forward to the day I have time to get into reloading!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is &#8220;a day-after the range&#8221; followup to my post of 28 Sep 2009.</p>
<p>As said, I have had and continue to have excellent results with the 175 gr Buffalo Bore match ammo.<br />
I also have had surprisingly good results with the cheap Federal blue-box 150 gr soft points which I used while sighting-in and breaking-in the rifle.</p>
<p>Yesterday, I tried Winchester&#8217;s Supreme Ballistic Silver Tips in 168 gr and 150 gr.  These are boat-tail nosler-point bullets.<br />
They sprayed all over the place at 100 and 200 yards.  Very erratic, not even real groups &#8211; way over 1 moa of spread from point of aim.  The barrel was clean. </p>
<p>This was an unpleasant surprise for me, since I have gotten superior results over the years with the same type of ammo in Win. 270, both 130 gr and 140 gr.  Yes, it&#8217;s a completely different rifle and is a single-shot bolt action.</p>
<p>However, at the end of the day, I tried another type in the FNAR:  Federal&#8217;s Premium 165 gr Sierra Game King provided acceptable results.  Groups of 5 at 100 and 200 yards were all within 1 MOA of the POA, usually 3 of the 5 within 1/2 MOA.  And that was when I was tired.  Would expect better results if rested.</p>
<p>For now, it looks as if that will be my hunting ammo for this season.  Looking forward to the day I have time to get into reloading!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-15858</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 20:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-15858</guid>
		<description>Another good article 
http://www.rifleshootermag.com/featured_rifles/RS_aforaccurate_200902/index.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another good article<br />
<a href="http://www.rifleshootermag.com/featured_rifles/RS_aforaccurate_200902/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.rifleshootermag.com/featured_rifles/RS_aforaccurate_200902/index.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-15856</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 20:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-15856</guid>
		<description>big dave, 
That&#039;s sweet but I would think Winchester would market it as a Deer rifle instead. Don&#039;t really need camo or .308 for varmits, unless there the size of Obama. least the varmits we have here you could use flame orange ballbats and they wouldn&#039;t care. Since FN, Browning and Winchester are under one roof I&#039;ll bet there is no differance in accuracy or quality. I might need another safe after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>big dave,<br />
That&#8217;s sweet but I would think Winchester would market it as a Deer rifle instead. Don&#8217;t really need camo or .308 for varmits, unless there the size of Obama. least the varmits we have here you could use flame orange ballbats and they wouldn&#8217;t care. Since FN, Browning and Winchester are under one roof I&#8217;ll bet there is no differance in accuracy or quality. I might need another safe after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-15770</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 13:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-15770</guid>
		<description>kind of interesting that these are showing up there and at gunbroker , yet  I can&#039;t find it even mentioned on the Winchester website. No info on it about any guarantee of accuracy or other details</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kind of interesting that these are showing up there and at gunbroker , yet  I can&#8217;t find it even mentioned on the Winchester website. No info on it about any guarantee of accuracy or other details</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: big dave</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-15688</link>
		<dc:creator>big dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 13:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-15688</guid>
		<description>has anyone seen the model that is being sold under the winchester name same rifle but full camo heavy bbl and less the two rails on the side of forearm.comes with ten round mag.i would think it would shoot as well as 

the fnar...if u want  to see it they have them on the gungenie website.

http://www.galleryofguns.com/genie/default.aspx?item=531051220</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>has anyone seen the model that is being sold under the winchester name same rifle but full camo heavy bbl and less the two rails on the side of forearm.comes with ten round mag.i would think it would shoot as well as </p>
<p>the fnar&#8230;if u want  to see it they have them on the gungenie website.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.galleryofguns.com/genie/default.aspx?item=531051220" rel="nofollow">http://www.galleryofguns.com/genie/default.aspx?item=531051220</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-15148</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 19:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-15148</guid>
		<description>Terry, great review, thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terry, great review, thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Cheek</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-15144</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Cheek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 16:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-15144</guid>
		<description>Looking at the gist of comments above, I&#039;d like to pitch-in and offer this on my relatively short experience with my FNAR heavy barrel, purchased Spring, 2009:  Have fired about 400 rounds through it so far.

For a good published review with photos, check out Quinn&#039;s Gunblast website.

I regard this rifle as multipurpose for hunting, fighting (self-defense) and medium-range target shooting.  I would love to get into a herd of hogs with it.  Hope to do just that this fall.  I&#039;ll also be taking a few deer with it.  Don&#039;t expect to need more than a single shot for that.

I am an AR-15 fan.  And I like the feel and fit of this rifle much better than most A-10&#039;s I&#039;ve handled (only at gunshows).  And, I too purchased it to fit a hole in my gunsafe.  I expect it to perform very well if the zombies come.

The stock combs, recoil pads and shims offer a great deal of versatile customization for comfort and fit.

Magazines:  Hard to come by.  Got my one extra from armaliterifles.com; still waiting on my 10-round mags, ordered 5 months ago.

To the best of my knowledge, this rifle accepts only the FNAR mag&#039;s.

Rifle shoots great!  You should expect sub-MOA groups.  To 700 yards is the farthest I&#039;ve gone at my deer lease.  Have shot many 3-rd groups w/holes touching at 100 yards.

I use a Leupold 6.5x20 LRT w/ tactical milling reticle; on a Nightforce unimount (base and rings are integral - easy on and off with two nuts/bolts).  You may not need that much scope, but my old eyes do, and I like to shoot paper at long distances.  That scope costs as much as the rifle!  But I also use it on another long-range rifle.

You could just as easlily mount a holographic scope with no magnification for relatively short-range work, or a lesser magnified scope.  Whatever your budget or need happens to be.  This rifle is very versatile in that respect.

With normal circumstances, I would be fairly comfortable and confident of an ethical shot to harvest deer or other big game out to 500 yards with the equipment I have.  But no further for me with ANY rifle, regardless of its accuracy.

I have used two different Harris bipods with swivels and locks, plus the LaRue QD adapter on each.

Have used Buffalo Bore match ammo and found it to be very consistent. Higher velocity and heavy bullet = fair amount of recoil.  In my case, the hvy bbl helps because I don&#039;t particularly like much recoil, and I can get back on the target quicker.

Had trouble at first with ammo-feed malfunctions on round-nosed 150-gr Federal&#039;s I was using for breaking-in and general range ammo.  Was pretty sure it was the magazine.  Took it to dealer, gunsmith adjusted the mag lip, and problem was solved in a few minutes.

Like Tony says above, the rifle ejects the the spent cartridge with vigor, and forms an indentention on the nose of the brass.  I had not previously  experienced that with other semi-auto&#039;s either.

A few things I don&#039;t like about the rifle:
Comes with only one magazine, and extra mag&#039;s are too darned hard to get.

Wish the handgrip was removable and replacable.  Don&#039;t like the hard plastic.  I&#039;m looking for a soft-rubber wrap for it.

For me, the rifle was difficult to dissassemble and reassemble for detailed cleaning of the piston system.  I have only done it once, and the learning curve was pretty steep and slow for me.  However, FN says that doesn&#039;t have to be done very often.  Probably depends on your shooting habits and ammo quality.

All in all, I&#039;m very pleased with the rifle.  Am looking forward to using it this hunting season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking at the gist of comments above, I&#8217;d like to pitch-in and offer this on my relatively short experience with my FNAR heavy barrel, purchased Spring, 2009:  Have fired about 400 rounds through it so far.</p>
<p>For a good published review with photos, check out Quinn&#8217;s Gunblast website.</p>
<p>I regard this rifle as multipurpose for hunting, fighting (self-defense) and medium-range target shooting.  I would love to get into a herd of hogs with it.  Hope to do just that this fall.  I&#8217;ll also be taking a few deer with it.  Don&#8217;t expect to need more than a single shot for that.</p>
<p>I am an AR-15 fan.  And I like the feel and fit of this rifle much better than most A-10&#8217;s I&#8217;ve handled (only at gunshows).  And, I too purchased it to fit a hole in my gunsafe.  I expect it to perform very well if the zombies come.</p>
<p>The stock combs, recoil pads and shims offer a great deal of versatile customization for comfort and fit.</p>
<p>Magazines:  Hard to come by.  Got my one extra from armaliterifles.com; still waiting on my 10-round mags, ordered 5 months ago.</p>
<p>To the best of my knowledge, this rifle accepts only the FNAR mag&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Rifle shoots great!  You should expect sub-MOA groups.  To 700 yards is the farthest I&#8217;ve gone at my deer lease.  Have shot many 3-rd groups w/holes touching at 100 yards.</p>
<p>I use a Leupold 6.5&#215;20 LRT w/ tactical milling reticle; on a Nightforce unimount (base and rings are integral &#8211; easy on and off with two nuts/bolts).  You may not need that much scope, but my old eyes do, and I like to shoot paper at long distances.  That scope costs as much as the rifle!  But I also use it on another long-range rifle.</p>
<p>You could just as easlily mount a holographic scope with no magnification for relatively short-range work, or a lesser magnified scope.  Whatever your budget or need happens to be.  This rifle is very versatile in that respect.</p>
<p>With normal circumstances, I would be fairly comfortable and confident of an ethical shot to harvest deer or other big game out to 500 yards with the equipment I have.  But no further for me with ANY rifle, regardless of its accuracy.</p>
<p>I have used two different Harris bipods with swivels and locks, plus the LaRue QD adapter on each.</p>
<p>Have used Buffalo Bore match ammo and found it to be very consistent. Higher velocity and heavy bullet = fair amount of recoil.  In my case, the hvy bbl helps because I don&#8217;t particularly like much recoil, and I can get back on the target quicker.</p>
<p>Had trouble at first with ammo-feed malfunctions on round-nosed 150-gr Federal&#8217;s I was using for breaking-in and general range ammo.  Was pretty sure it was the magazine.  Took it to dealer, gunsmith adjusted the mag lip, and problem was solved in a few minutes.</p>
<p>Like Tony says above, the rifle ejects the the spent cartridge with vigor, and forms an indentention on the nose of the brass.  I had not previously  experienced that with other semi-auto&#8217;s either.</p>
<p>A few things I don&#8217;t like about the rifle:<br />
Comes with only one magazine, and extra mag&#8217;s are too darned hard to get.</p>
<p>Wish the handgrip was removable and replacable.  Don&#8217;t like the hard plastic.  I&#8217;m looking for a soft-rubber wrap for it.</p>
<p>For me, the rifle was difficult to dissassemble and reassemble for detailed cleaning of the piston system.  I have only done it once, and the learning curve was pretty steep and slow for me.  However, FN says that doesn&#8217;t have to be done very often.  Probably depends on your shooting habits and ammo quality.</p>
<p>All in all, I&#8217;m very pleased with the rifle.  Am looking forward to using it this hunting season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earl</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-15130</link>
		<dc:creator>Earl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 01:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-15130</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the great advice, Mark. I certainly appreciate your input on this matter. Since reliability and general versatility ( including the ability to readily digest a wide range of available ammunition in the appropriate caliber ) in a balanced assault rifle type package are what I&#039;m looking for, I think the FNAR would suit me better.

Perhaps I should have elaborated a little more about what I was looking for in a conversion kit and what I meant by &quot;military-style&quot; --- specifically, a folding stock, addition of a flash suppressor for night engagements and the ability to readily accept laser sights. These features go a long way towards making any rifle more suitable for shipboard storage and use as a defensive weapon.

From what I&#039;ve seen and read so far, the FNAR will probably have no problem accepting the latter, so if you or anyone else has an answer to the first two requirements, please let me know.


Earl</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the great advice, Mark. I certainly appreciate your input on this matter. Since reliability and general versatility ( including the ability to readily digest a wide range of available ammunition in the appropriate caliber ) in a balanced assault rifle type package are what I&#8217;m looking for, I think the FNAR would suit me better.</p>
<p>Perhaps I should have elaborated a little more about what I was looking for in a conversion kit and what I meant by &#8220;military-style&#8221; &#8212; specifically, a folding stock, addition of a flash suppressor for night engagements and the ability to readily accept laser sights. These features go a long way towards making any rifle more suitable for shipboard storage and use as a defensive weapon.</p>
<p>From what I&#8217;ve seen and read so far, the FNAR will probably have no problem accepting the latter, so if you or anyone else has an answer to the first two requirements, please let me know.</p>
<p>Earl</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-15125</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 23:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-15125</guid>
		<description>Earl,
In its present configuration, you can put on any accessory that you might want to attach to an AR15 or AR10. Rather than try to modify it to look like an AR 10 ( which is what I assume you mean by military style) then I would suggest you just spend the few extra hundred dollars and get an armalite AR10t. At least as accurate as the fnar, but the fnar will shoot pretty much any ammo flawlessly, where as due to tighter tolerances, the ar10t needs the best ammo you can get to  recycle without jamming</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earl,<br />
In its present configuration, you can put on any accessory that you might want to attach to an AR15 or AR10. Rather than try to modify it to look like an AR 10 ( which is what I assume you mean by military style) then I would suggest you just spend the few extra hundred dollars and get an armalite AR10t. At least as accurate as the fnar, but the fnar will shoot pretty much any ammo flawlessly, where as due to tighter tolerances, the ar10t needs the best ammo you can get to  recycle without jamming</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earl</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-15109</link>
		<dc:creator>Earl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 16:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-15109</guid>
		<description>This is an excellent forum and I&#039;ve learned a lot more about the FNAR from readers&#039; comments and experiences as well as from other sites. My questions pretty much echo JC&#039;s --- I&#039;d like to find out if conversion kits to upgrade the FNAR to a military-type configuration are, or will possibly soon be, available, and from whom. 

I sail a lot and have found that a reliable assault-style rifle is ideal for vessel defence against piracy and other acts of hostility, but I would also like to retain the best possible long-range accuracy in the same weapon, hence my interest in the FNAR. 

Any help with this would be much appreciated.


With Best Regards To All,
Earl</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an excellent forum and I&#8217;ve learned a lot more about the FNAR from readers&#8217; comments and experiences as well as from other sites. My questions pretty much echo JC&#8217;s &#8212; I&#8217;d like to find out if conversion kits to upgrade the FNAR to a military-type configuration are, or will possibly soon be, available, and from whom. </p>
<p>I sail a lot and have found that a reliable assault-style rifle is ideal for vessel defence against piracy and other acts of hostility, but I would also like to retain the best possible long-range accuracy in the same weapon, hence my interest in the FNAR. </p>
<p>Any help with this would be much appreciated.</p>
<p>With Best Regards To All,<br />
Earl</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-15072</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-15072</guid>
		<description>I use a versa pod with quick release to remove it from the fixed rail mount which is extra, It is a little heavier but very sturdy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use a versa pod with quick release to remove it from the fixed rail mount which is extra, It is a little heavier but very sturdy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-15021</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-15021</guid>
		<description>I would like to know which bipods to use</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to know which bipods to use</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JC</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-14983</link>
		<dc:creator>JC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 02:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-14983</guid>
		<description>Hello
Hopefully someone can help with this. Has anyone found replacement stocks for the FNAR?
Will the Browning BAR Forearm fit the FNAR?
Has anyone changed ther FNAR into a Carbine?
 
                                                    Help!!! JC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello<br />
Hopefully someone can help with this. Has anyone found replacement stocks for the FNAR?<br />
Will the Browning BAR Forearm fit the FNAR?<br />
Has anyone changed ther FNAR into a Carbine?</p>
<p>                                                    Help!!! JC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robs Gun Shop</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-14975</link>
		<dc:creator>Robs Gun Shop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 23:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-14975</guid>
		<description>Dear FNAR lovers
            FN tells me they are trying to keep up with demand for Mags
            but police and militarys come first. Be patient keep checking 
            your local gun dealers for mags the gun is worth it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear FNAR lovers<br />
            FN tells me they are trying to keep up with demand for Mags<br />
            but police and militarys come first. Be patient keep checking<br />
            your local gun dealers for mags the gun is worth it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big-FED</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-14586</link>
		<dc:creator>Big-FED</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-14586</guid>
		<description>Tony, Many thanks.  Looks like a FNAR is in my future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony, Many thanks.  Looks like a FNAR is in my future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-14583</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-14583</guid>
		<description>Big-Fed, the info I&#039;ve gathered from other Forums is that the FN-FAL Mags will not work in this. Mag availability &amp; price is the biggest challenge to this rifle, but just about the only one... and as a new gun, somewhat to be expected. Who needs more than 20 rapid &amp; accurate shots at distance anyway :)

If you&#039;re on the fence, here&#039;s a pretty nice write-up that has more information in one-spot than I&#039;ve seen prior: http://gunblast.com/FN-AR.htm

On Ammo - Per my post above, I&#039;ve fired Remington 150Gr &amp; Serbian 168 Gr Match (not Russian, specifically Prvi Partizan .308 Match 168grn HP) in the past and recently purchased 500 rds of Brown Bear Russian 145grn FMJ which I tested 120 rds this past weekend 72-200 yards - worked flawlessly. Surprisingly, the PP 168 &amp; BB 145 were dead-on without any elevation adjustments required (Rem 150 shot 1&quot; higher). I shot 20 of another off-brand my first trip out, but can&#039;t recall the brand. It seems to eat whatever you put through no probs!

I have some Barnaul that I haven&#039;t shot due to the bullet/casing paint primer/lacquer - Don&#039;t want it to dirty up my pretty rig... if SHTF, I&#039;m confident it&#039;d go through no probs &amp; would have plenty of free time to clean it :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big-Fed, the info I&#8217;ve gathered from other Forums is that the FN-FAL Mags will not work in this. Mag availability &amp; price is the biggest challenge to this rifle, but just about the only one&#8230; and as a new gun, somewhat to be expected. Who needs more than 20 rapid &amp; accurate shots at distance anyway <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>If you&#8217;re on the fence, here&#8217;s a pretty nice write-up that has more information in one-spot than I&#8217;ve seen prior: <a href="http://gunblast.com/FN-AR.htm" rel="nofollow">http://gunblast.com/FN-AR.htm</a></p>
<p>On Ammo &#8211; Per my post above, I&#8217;ve fired Remington 150Gr &amp; Serbian 168 Gr Match (not Russian, specifically Prvi Partizan .308 Match 168grn HP) in the past and recently purchased 500 rds of Brown Bear Russian 145grn FMJ which I tested 120 rds this past weekend 72-200 yards &#8211; worked flawlessly. Surprisingly, the PP 168 &amp; BB 145 were dead-on without any elevation adjustments required (Rem 150 shot 1&#8243; higher). I shot 20 of another off-brand my first trip out, but can&#8217;t recall the brand. It seems to eat whatever you put through no probs!</p>
<p>I have some Barnaul that I haven&#8217;t shot due to the bullet/casing paint primer/lacquer &#8211; Don&#8217;t want it to dirty up my pretty rig&#8230; if SHTF, I&#8217;m confident it&#8217;d go through no probs &amp; would have plenty of free time to clean it <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big-FED</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-14574</link>
		<dc:creator>Big-FED</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-14574</guid>
		<description>Also, how does this rifle do with &quot;standard&quot;/available military style ball ammo?  After all, primary potential use for this rifle will be for SHTF more than hunting and user will have to make do with what ammo is available and not much of that is going to be the really great stuff everyone is using to get those tight groups.

A little real world thought on how this rifle behaves with what ammo we may actually end up having to shoot would help.  There is a huge variety of 7.62x51 military ball ammo out there and it is more likely we will end up shooting a lot more of that than the Buffalo Bore, Black Hills match grade stuff. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, how does this rifle do with &#8220;standard&#8221;/available military style ball ammo?  After all, primary potential use for this rifle will be for SHTF more than hunting and user will have to make do with what ammo is available and not much of that is going to be the really great stuff everyone is using to get those tight groups.</p>
<p>A little real world thought on how this rifle behaves with what ammo we may actually end up having to shoot would help.  There is a huge variety of 7.62&#215;51 military ball ammo out there and it is more likely we will end up shooting a lot more of that than the Buffalo Bore, Black Hills match grade stuff. <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big-FED</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-14570</link>
		<dc:creator>Big-FED</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-14570</guid>
		<description>Will FN-FAL mags work?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will FN-FAL mags work?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-14366</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 16:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-14366</guid>
		<description>Spent 5 hours at the range Thursday with a couple rifles, I used 175 Buffalo Bore and 175 Federal sierra match ammo. both performed flawlessly in my FNAR. the Federal shot about an inch higher than the Buffalo bore but both had the same groupings. see target groupings at the bottom of the attached article, http://gunblast.com/FN-AR.htm
this is exactly what my FNAR does using the above ammo and Federal 168 match. I also used a hyskore rest to get these results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spent 5 hours at the range Thursday with a couple rifles, I used 175 Buffalo Bore and 175 Federal sierra match ammo. both performed flawlessly in my FNAR. the Federal shot about an inch higher than the Buffalo bore but both had the same groupings. see target groupings at the bottom of the attached article, <a href="http://gunblast.com/FN-AR.htm" rel="nofollow">http://gunblast.com/FN-AR.htm</a><br />
this is exactly what my FNAR does using the above ammo and Federal 168 match. I also used a hyskore rest to get these results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-13742</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 23:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-13742</guid>
		<description>Sent mine back to FN last Friday, just couldn&#039;t get the rifle to shoot the type of groups it should be able to shoot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sent mine back to FN last Friday, just couldn&#8217;t get the rifle to shoot the type of groups it should be able to shoot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-13469</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 02:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-13469</guid>
		<description>I suggest calling CDNN Sports @ 800-588-9500. They had the heavy &amp; light barrels in stock when I ordered mine. Prices were far better than those of my range or local providers - $250-400 less! I&#039;ve ordered 4-5 weapons from them &amp; only issue I&#039;d note... they expect you to know what you want &amp; &#039;time is money&#039; to their Sales Reps. 

Also as a tip to the group - this is the best price I&#039;ve found for &#039;range ammo&#039; - just ordered 500 rounds myself. Reviews call it a bit dirty, but 1/2 the price of normal range ammo (ie twice the fun!) &amp; no typical russian Red Primer to coat the barrel... 

$7.95/20 rounds - Brown Bear .308 145grn FMJ
http://www.aimsurplus.com/acatalog/Brown_Bear_.308_145grn_FMJ.html

I can post a review if anyone wants. LMK.

Enjoy!
Tony</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suggest calling CDNN Sports @ 800-588-9500. They had the heavy &amp; light barrels in stock when I ordered mine. Prices were far better than those of my range or local providers &#8211; $250-400 less! I&#8217;ve ordered 4-5 weapons from them &amp; only issue I&#8217;d note&#8230; they expect you to know what you want &amp; &#8216;time is money&#8217; to their Sales Reps. </p>
<p>Also as a tip to the group &#8211; this is the best price I&#8217;ve found for &#8216;range ammo&#8217; &#8211; just ordered 500 rounds myself. Reviews call it a bit dirty, but 1/2 the price of normal range ammo (ie twice the fun!) &amp; no typical russian Red Primer to coat the barrel&#8230; </p>
<p>$7.95/20 rounds &#8211; Brown Bear .308 145grn FMJ<br />
<a href="http://www.aimsurplus.com/acatalog/Brown_Bear_.308_145grn_FMJ.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.aimsurplus.com/acatalog/Brown_Bear_.308_145grn_FMJ.html</a></p>
<p>I can post a review if anyone wants. LMK.</p>
<p>Enjoy!<br />
Tony</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-13463</link>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 00:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-13463</guid>
		<description>i will be purchasing the heavy barrel model does anybody  know how easy  the firearms are to come by, and what kind of accuracy can i obtain at 300 yds. with match ammo with a leupold mark 2 scope 4-12x 40mm?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i will be purchasing the heavy barrel model does anybody  know how easy  the firearms are to come by, and what kind of accuracy can i obtain at 300 yds. with match ammo with a leupold mark 2 scope 4-12x 40mm?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-13246</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 23:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-13246</guid>
		<description>I bought my FNAR in May, but took a while to pick rings/scope as this is my 1st hunting rifle (have AR &amp; AR, but not scoped). Finally decided on Warne steel rings (reusable) &amp; Nikon Prostaff 3-9 x40 - A cheap entry-level which I could upgrade from once I learn the basics &amp; can improve my shot w/ better glass. I finally sighted in last week, using Remington 150Gr &amp; Russian 168 Gr Match. I got within 3-4&quot; groups @ 100m in first ~20 rounds (remember I&#039;m a rookie &amp; my first sighting) &amp; routinely within that 3-4&quot; between ammo types for next few mags (poor lighting @ range w/ 100m limit). To fire my last 20 Win 168Gr, I shot pretty rapid (full mag &lt; 40 Sec) hitting w/i 5&quot;, but noticable 1&quot; drop from the Win 150Gr I had just been firing... net-net, I think the 150 had better velocity &amp; consistency than the heavier 168 OR didn&#039;t account for drop when sighting w/ mix ammo ... which I didn&#039;t notice while firing slowly &amp; thinking my aim was off - From the rookie. 

The recoil was managable &amp; only odd thing I found was the expended casing was expelled so hard from the chamber, it bent the brass nose to a D shape on all the rounds, making some scratches at the rear of the extraction port. I&#039;m sure this is known to the folks here as normal, but as a rookie, thought it odd. One would certainly have to true the brass nose for reloading purposes.

I love the weapon &amp; selected it for my 1st hunting rifle as it seemed to have rave reviews (outside of mag availability) compared to many other rifles/calibers out there... and was much better priced than many ($1300 @ CDNN Sports).

Question - I have ~260 rounds of Barnaul 7/62x51 ammo ($7.50/box - why I bought it!) which has the red primer where the brass/round meet - was initially told lacquer, but then corrected this is around the primer. I&#039;ve heard from some that this primer is a bear to clean out when rifle cools &amp; I should avoid ammo with it like the plague... others have said use a box of non-primered ammo to &#039;clean the bore&#039; while hot after firing primered ammo... other military types have said use it &amp; no big deal... any thoughts on putting this through &#039;my baby&#039;? 

Thanks in advance! 
Tony</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought my FNAR in May, but took a while to pick rings/scope as this is my 1st hunting rifle (have AR &amp; AR, but not scoped). Finally decided on Warne steel rings (reusable) &amp; Nikon Prostaff 3-9 x40 &#8211; A cheap entry-level which I could upgrade from once I learn the basics &amp; can improve my shot w/ better glass. I finally sighted in last week, using Remington 150Gr &amp; Russian 168 Gr Match. I got within 3-4&#8243; groups @ 100m in first ~20 rounds (remember I&#8217;m a rookie &amp; my first sighting) &amp; routinely within that 3-4&#8243; between ammo types for next few mags (poor lighting @ range w/ 100m limit). To fire my last 20 Win 168Gr, I shot pretty rapid (full mag &lt; 40 Sec) hitting w/i 5&quot;, but noticable 1&quot; drop from the Win 150Gr I had just been firing&#8230; net-net, I think the 150 had better velocity &amp; consistency than the heavier 168 OR didn&#039;t account for drop when sighting w/ mix ammo &#8230; which I didn&#039;t notice while firing slowly &amp; thinking my aim was off &#8211; From the rookie. </p>
<p>The recoil was managable &amp; only odd thing I found was the expended casing was expelled so hard from the chamber, it bent the brass nose to a D shape on all the rounds, making some scratches at the rear of the extraction port. I&#039;m sure this is known to the folks here as normal, but as a rookie, thought it odd. One would certainly have to true the brass nose for reloading purposes.</p>
<p>I love the weapon &amp; selected it for my 1st hunting rifle as it seemed to have rave reviews (outside of mag availability) compared to many other rifles/calibers out there&#8230; and was much better priced than many ($1300 @ CDNN Sports).</p>
<p>Question &#8211; I have ~260 rounds of Barnaul 7/62&#215;51 ammo ($7.50/box &#8211; why I bought it!) which has the red primer where the brass/round meet &#8211; was initially told lacquer, but then corrected this is around the primer. I&#039;ve heard from some that this primer is a bear to clean out when rifle cools &amp; I should avoid ammo with it like the plague&#8230; others have said use a box of non-primered ammo to &#039;clean the bore&#039; while hot after firing primered ammo&#8230; other military types have said use it &amp; no big deal&#8230; any thoughts on putting this through &#039;my baby&#039;? </p>
<p>Thanks in advance!<br />
Tony</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-13171</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 22:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-13171</guid>
		<description>Walton,

Just to let you know I have a light barrel and am having the same problems as you.  I can fire maybe 2 nice shots and then the group opens to 5&quot; or more.  I am switching scopes and buying some 168gr match ammo to see if that make any difference. Hoping I don&#039;t have to ship back.  Look forward to hearing if sending it in fixed your problems. 

Good Luck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walton,</p>
<p>Just to let you know I have a light barrel and am having the same problems as you.  I can fire maybe 2 nice shots and then the group opens to 5&#8243; or more.  I am switching scopes and buying some 168gr match ammo to see if that make any difference. Hoping I don&#8217;t have to ship back.  Look forward to hearing if sending it in fixed your problems. </p>
<p>Good Luck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-13108</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-13108</guid>
		<description>Walton,
Thanks for the update. I will  be eager to hear what they find out. Keep us imformed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walton,<br />
Thanks for the update. I will  be eager to hear what they find out. Keep us imformed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walton</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-13068</link>
		<dc:creator>Walton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-13068</guid>
		<description>Called FN back, they sent me a shipping label and are going to check the rifle out there. I went back to the range this weekend and fired two test groups of 5 shots at 100. Changed the scope in between them to rule out the scope being the problem. Same results, and am sending them the targets and brass. The guy at FN sounded very eager to help and I am so far satisfied with thier customer service dept.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Called FN back, they sent me a shipping label and are going to check the rifle out there. I went back to the range this weekend and fired two test groups of 5 shots at 100. Changed the scope in between them to rule out the scope being the problem. Same results, and am sending them the targets and brass. The guy at FN sounded very eager to help and I am so far satisfied with thier customer service dept.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walton</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-12951</link>
		<dc:creator>Walton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 14:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-12951</guid>
		<description>I am going back to the range this weekend and am going to change the scope, I contacted FN and Tim spoke with me for a half hour and was very nice, they are sending me a shipping label and he said it would be taken care of. Yes, I have had a scope problem new out of the box recently, and it was a Meopta I put on my new AR10, the guy talked me into it at the store, I have always bought Leupold scopes since I was kneehigh to a grasshopper...Tim said they do all of their accuracy tests with the Fed GoldMatch 168gr. I will see what happens with the scope change, thank you guys for the help...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am going back to the range this weekend and am going to change the scope, I contacted FN and Tim spoke with me for a half hour and was very nice, they are sending me a shipping label and he said it would be taken care of. Yes, I have had a scope problem new out of the box recently, and it was a Meopta I put on my new AR10, the guy talked me into it at the store, I have always bought Leupold scopes since I was kneehigh to a grasshopper&#8230;Tim said they do all of their accuracy tests with the Fed GoldMatch 168gr. I will see what happens with the scope change, thank you guys for the help&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-12927</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 21:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-12927</guid>
		<description>I have a light barrel on my gun with a leupold vari x3 on it. I get 1 moa or better with pretty much any ammo I put through it. I have used federal 150 grain , Winchester 168 grain and  reloaded ammo  with a 168 grain Hornady amax moly. The federal  150 grain gave me the worst groups, but still  much better than what Walton is getting. 
I agree with trying a different scope before blaming the  gun. I have read where a scope gone bad will frequently show up first with suttle widening of the groups.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a light barrel on my gun with a leupold vari x3 on it. I get 1 moa or better with pretty much any ammo I put through it. I have used federal 150 grain , Winchester 168 grain and  reloaded ammo  with a 168 grain Hornady amax moly. The federal  150 grain gave me the worst groups, but still  much better than what Walton is getting.<br />
I agree with trying a different scope before blaming the  gun. I have read where a scope gone bad will frequently show up first with suttle widening of the groups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-12911</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 14:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-12911</guid>
		<description>Walton,
I have a heavy barrel and a freind has a heavy and we do not get that fluxuation when thay are very hot. Some of the guys with light barrels may be able to give you their experience but what you are experiencing does not sound right of course. FN gaurentees 1 MOA or better and when I talked to them at the show they told me it was much better than 1 and I told them mine was much much better. We just tried some HSN 168 and they did really well. 
Recommend contacting FN of course, they should replace that barrel. I once had a new 338 hunting rifle that I had a new Leupold on it that did that and the scope was defective. I took a scope off my 300 and put it on the 338 and it held fine then. Cabela&#039;s replaced it and its been fine for years now.
If anyone with light barrels have any info maybe they can respond.
Good Luck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walton,<br />
I have a heavy barrel and a freind has a heavy and we do not get that fluxuation when thay are very hot. Some of the guys with light barrels may be able to give you their experience but what you are experiencing does not sound right of course. FN gaurentees 1 MOA or better and when I talked to them at the show they told me it was much better than 1 and I told them mine was much much better. We just tried some HSN 168 and they did really well.<br />
Recommend contacting FN of course, they should replace that barrel. I once had a new 338 hunting rifle that I had a new Leupold on it that did that and the scope was defective. I took a scope off my 300 and put it on the 338 and it held fine then. Cabela&#8217;s replaced it and its been fine for years now.<br />
If anyone with light barrels have any info maybe they can respond.<br />
Good Luck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-12907</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 13:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-12907</guid>
		<description>Mark,
Sorry to hear about your GS, they are very devoted dogs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,<br />
Sorry to hear about your GS, they are very devoted dogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walton</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-12814</link>
		<dc:creator>Walton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 18:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-12814</guid>
		<description>Kevin,    I have been back to the range several more times. I have now tried the 175gr Fed Gold Match and several more factory rounds, several were Hornady (they usually always shoot very well) and I am still unable to get better than 2&quot; with it. Seems like the barrel starts to warm up after the second shot and it opens well up into the 3-5&quot; range going into the 5th shot, thats with 15 minute cool downs between every shot. I guess I need to send it to FN. I was really hoping for a consistent shooter at 1&quot; or better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin,    I have been back to the range several more times. I have now tried the 175gr Fed Gold Match and several more factory rounds, several were Hornady (they usually always shoot very well) and I am still unable to get better than 2&#8243; with it. Seems like the barrel starts to warm up after the second shot and it opens well up into the 3-5&#8243; range going into the 5th shot, thats with 15 minute cool downs between every shot. I guess I need to send it to FN. I was really hoping for a consistent shooter at 1&#8243; or better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-12759</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 17:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-12759</guid>
		<description>Kevin 
very happy that you joined. I lost my 4 y/oGSP female last year to an accident, so I gave up bird hunting. Now just foxhunting on  horseback with my pack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin<br />
very happy that you joined. I lost my 4 y/oGSP female last year to an accident, so I gave up bird hunting. Now just foxhunting on  horseback with my pack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-12720</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 13:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-12720</guid>
		<description>Mark,
Just checked out United States Sportman&#039;s Alliance, Looks good so I just joined. I am a life member of the NRA and Pheasant&#039;s Forever, also belong to the Second Amendment Foundation and My State organization. I have a male GSP that lives to hunt. Like I said, Obamer is funeling money to these anti gunner and anti hunting groups and is in his plan to back door us on everything. And since this is a FNAR blog, I really like the FNAR to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,<br />
Just checked out United States Sportman&#8217;s Alliance, Looks good so I just joined. I am a life member of the NRA and Pheasant&#8217;s Forever, also belong to the Second Amendment Foundation and My State organization. I have a male GSP that lives to hunt. Like I said, Obamer is funeling money to these anti gunner and anti hunting groups and is in his plan to back door us on everything. And since this is a FNAR blog, I really like the FNAR to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-12506</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 12:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-12506</guid>
		<description>I echo Kevin&#039;s plea that we all need to be NRA members, whether you agree with all their policies or not. If there were no NRA this forum would not exist because these guns we own and  love would not exist.
I would just add that if you are a hunter and especially if you hunt with a dog or hounds, join the United States Sportsman Alliance. Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) is the hunter&#039;s arch enemy and  is using its $100 million dollar  war chest  to try to eliminate hunting and they are doing that now by attacking sporting dog ownership through puppy mill legislation in many states . At least visit USSA&#039;s website and  check them out. Sorry to go off topic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I echo Kevin&#8217;s plea that we all need to be NRA members, whether you agree with all their policies or not. If there were no NRA this forum would not exist because these guns we own and  love would not exist.<br />
I would just add that if you are a hunter and especially if you hunt with a dog or hounds, join the United States Sportsman Alliance. Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) is the hunter&#8217;s arch enemy and  is using its $100 million dollar  war chest  to try to eliminate hunting and they are doing that now by attacking sporting dog ownership through puppy mill legislation in many states . At least visit USSA&#8217;s website and  check them out. Sorry to go off topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-12480</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 18:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-12480</guid>
		<description>Tom, that is a nice collection you have. Alot better than my DPMS, Smith &amp; Wesson &amp; Daniel Defense AR&#039;s. Sorry you doubt me but I am happy with it. And I really like the FNAR. Keep up the shootin. 
Everyone please, we all need to be NRA members. if your not please join. We need to be 80,000,000 strong against the anti gunners. Obama&#039;s going to back door us one day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, that is a nice collection you have. Alot better than my DPMS, Smith &amp; Wesson &amp; Daniel Defense AR&#8217;s. Sorry you doubt me but I am happy with it. And I really like the FNAR. Keep up the shootin.<br />
Everyone please, we all need to be NRA members. if your not please join. We need to be 80,000,000 strong against the anti gunners. Obama&#8217;s going to back door us one day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JC</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-12376</link>
		<dc:creator>JC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 03:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-12376</guid>
		<description>Hello
Hopefully someone can help with this.                         Has anyone found replacement stocks for the FNAR?
Will the Browning BAR Forearm fit the FNAR?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello<br />
Hopefully someone can help with this.                         Has anyone found replacement stocks for the FNAR?<br />
Will the Browning BAR Forearm fit the FNAR?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-12331</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 02:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-12331</guid>
		<description>Kevin, I never said gas guns are not accurate. In fact, I shoot a Noveske AR10, Armalite SASS, GAP built MK12 Mod 0, regularly with good results. I just doubted your sub 1/4 MOA claim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin, I never said gas guns are not accurate. In fact, I shoot a Noveske AR10, Armalite SASS, GAP built MK12 Mod 0, regularly with good results. I just doubted your sub 1/4 MOA claim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-12315</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 18:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/06/fnar-762x51mm/#comment-12315</guid>
		<description>FNAR magazines are available in the 20-round size at Bart&#039;s (or Burt&#039;s) Sporting Goods.  Phone 1-410-761-8686 or 1-410-768-8643.  They were very helpful, but the price was $57 and change for one 20 rd. mag plus shipping.  The five round size mag. (for hunting) is not going to be available until September.  FN Herstal said they are shipping all they can make of the 20 round mags. now and waiting until later on toward hunting season to make and ship the five round mags. required in many states. 

The FNAR I have gets good accuracy (1 and 2 inch groups) at 100 yds with many brands of cheap ammo but my 168 gr. Hornady bthp handloads get same hole results consistently at 100 yds.  This is just a great rifle when fitted with a 4-16 power scope, green laser, and tactical flashlight which uses up all of the factory picatinny rails.  Pricey, but worth the money with the heavy barrel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FNAR magazines are available in the 20-round size at Bart&#8217;s (or Burt&#8217;s) Sporting Goods.  Phone 1-410-761-8686 or 1-410-768-8643.  They were very helpful, but the price was $57 and change for one 20 rd. mag plus shipping.  The five round size mag. (for hunting) is not going to be available until September.  FN Herstal said they are shipping all they can make of the 20 round mags. now and waiting until later on toward hunting season to make and ship the five round mags. required in many states. </p>
<p>The FNAR I have gets good accuracy (1 and 2 inch groups) at 100 yds with many brands of cheap ammo but my 168 gr. Hornady bthp handloads get same hole results consistently at 100 yds.  This is just a great rifle when fitted with a 4-16 power scope, green laser, and tactical flashlight which uses up all of the factory picatinny rails.  Pricey, but worth the money with the heavy barrel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
