<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Laser range finding scopes compared</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/22/laser-range-finding-scopes-compared/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/22/laser-range-finding-scopes-compared/</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:19:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: len brown</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/22/laser-range-finding-scopes-compared/comment-page-1/#comment-4004</link>
		<dc:creator>len brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 21:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/22/laser-range-finding-scopes-compared/#comment-4004</guid>
		<description>I am trying to decide on what scopes to buy form y 223/5.56 and 7.62 carbines. I was considering the  NcStar 4x32 mark III IR Tactical scope for the 223 because it is calibrated (say so anyway) for a 223.

This is a range finder illuminated reticle pm combathunting .com

I was considering the EOTECH 512-C for the 7.62 but am not sure if it would be better to go with a scope instead of a holo. What is your advice?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am trying to decide on what scopes to buy form y 223/5.56 and 7.62 carbines. I was considering the  NcStar 4&#215;32 mark III IR Tactical scope for the 223 because it is calibrated (say so anyway) for a 223.</p>
<p>This is a range finder illuminated reticle pm combathunting .com</p>
<p>I was considering the EOTECH 512-C for the 7.62 but am not sure if it would be better to go with a scope instead of a holo. What is your advice?</p>
<div class="CommentRating">Please rate this comment: <img style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="up-4004" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/images/1_14_up.png" alt="Thumb up" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('4004', 'add', 'www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '1_14_');" title="Thumb up" /> <span id="karma-4004-up" style="font-size:12px; color:#009933;">0</span>&nbsp;<img style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="down-4004" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/images/1_14_down.png" alt="Thumb down" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('4004', 'subtract', 'www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '1_14_')" title="Thumb down" /> <span id="karma-4004-down" style="font-size:12px; color:#990033;">0</span></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (Requested URI is rejected)

Served from: www.thefirearmblog.com @ 2012-02-11 10:37:18 -->
