<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sidelock Glock Safety trigger</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/07/sidelock-glock-safety-trigger/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/07/sidelock-glock-safety-trigger/</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:38:33 +1300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jreyntra</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/07/sidelock-glock-safety-trigger/#comment-17280</link>
		<dc:creator>jreyntra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 01:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/07/sidelock-glock-safety-trigger/#comment-17280</guid>
		<description>If you are really concerned about safety, consider  a revolver or a Springfield XD......the XD has a trigger safety like the Glock but also a grip safety like the 1911......the XD has a cocked indicator and a visible and manual indicator of loaded chamber........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are really concerned about safety, consider  a revolver or a Springfield XD&#8230;&#8230;the XD has a trigger safety like the Glock but also a grip safety like the 1911&#8230;&#8230;the XD has a cocked indicator and a visible and manual indicator of loaded chamber&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/07/sidelock-glock-safety-trigger/#comment-7302</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 06:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/07/sidelock-glock-safety-trigger/#comment-7302</guid>
		<description>aaileen, I do not recommend a glock with an external safety. Any external safety will be added by someone after manufacturer. Unless you are technical enough to understand how it works and if it has problems, you could be buying yourself an unreliable pistol. I personally am no engineer so I would stay away from adding extra mechanical devices that could fail.

Glocks have an internal safety. With any gun ultimately the only safety worth anything is good training. There are many pistols that are decent, maybe you should consider a revolver if you are worried about safety.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aaileen, I do not recommend a glock with an external safety. Any external safety will be added by someone after manufacturer. Unless you are technical enough to understand how it works and if it has problems, you could be buying yourself an unreliable pistol. I personally am no engineer so I would stay away from adding extra mechanical devices that could fail.</p>
<p>Glocks have an internal safety. With any gun ultimately the only safety worth anything is good training. There are many pistols that are decent, maybe you should consider a revolver if you are worried about safety.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aaileen</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/07/sidelock-glock-safety-trigger/#comment-7298</link>
		<dc:creator>aaileen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 05:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/07/sidelock-glock-safety-trigger/#comment-7298</guid>
		<description>Im wife and a mother. My husband is always out of town. Im looking into buying a glock 26 with the external safety. He doesn&#039;t think the safety is a good idea. How wrong can I be? I have a riffle that Im good with.  But i get nervous with hand guns......... What&#039;s a good gun with a safety?????????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im wife and a mother. My husband is always out of town. Im looking into buying a glock 26 with the external safety. He doesn&#8217;t think the safety is a good idea. How wrong can I be? I have a riffle that Im good with.  But i get nervous with hand guns&#8230;&#8230;&#8230; What&#8217;s a good gun with a safety?????????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/07/sidelock-glock-safety-trigger/#comment-3475</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 08:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/07/sidelock-glock-safety-trigger/#comment-3475</guid>
		<description>I imagine that this kind of safety device will get worn out and get loosen up? Making it practically useless</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I imagine that this kind of safety device will get worn out and get loosen up? Making it practically useless</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: don</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/07/sidelock-glock-safety-trigger/#comment-3398</link>
		<dc:creator>don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/07/sidelock-glock-safety-trigger/#comment-3398</guid>
		<description>no way, &quot;can you just wait a second till i push this button on the trigger so i can shoot&quot;, manual safety under stress is bad enough</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no way, &#8220;can you just wait a second till i push this button on the trigger so i can shoot&#8221;, manual safety under stress is bad enough</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/07/sidelock-glock-safety-trigger/#comment-1001</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 20:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/07/sidelock-glock-safety-trigger/#comment-1001</guid>
		<description>It is not something I would use. I have said again and again on the blog that the less external safeties the better. But there are some people who are just not comfortable with no external safety.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not something I would use. I have said again and again on the blog that the less external safeties the better. But there are some people who are just not comfortable with no external safety.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveP.</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/07/sidelock-glock-safety-trigger/#comment-998</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveP.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 18:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/01/07/sidelock-glock-safety-trigger/#comment-998</guid>
		<description>Dumb. The entire point of a Glock,  the thing that has made them so successful, is the fact that you DON&#039;T have to mess with anything other than the trigger- total simplicity producing total speed, nothing to forget or to get stuck. Now here we introduce something else to screw with, or forget in the heat and confusion of the moment; something else totally nonintuitive that needs to be practived ad infinitum before the gun can be relied upon in a problem.

No frigging thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dumb. The entire point of a Glock,  the thing that has made them so successful, is the fact that you DON&#8217;T have to mess with anything other than the trigger- total simplicity producing total speed, nothing to forget or to get stuck. Now here we introduce something else to screw with, or forget in the heat and confusion of the moment; something else totally nonintuitive that needs to be practived ad infinitum before the gun can be relied upon in a problem.</p>
<p>No frigging thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
