<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ruger Charger Pistol</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/21/ruger-charger-pistol/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/21/ruger-charger-pistol/</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:38:33 +1300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/21/ruger-charger-pistol/#comment-9493</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 10:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/21/ruger-charger-pistol/#comment-9493</guid>
		<description>Duffy, great to hear!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duffy, great to hear!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duffy St.Pierre</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/21/ruger-charger-pistol/#comment-9492</link>
		<dc:creator>Duffy St.Pierre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 10:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/21/ruger-charger-pistol/#comment-9492</guid>
		<description>Got the 10/22 Charger as a gift a few weeks after I bought a Dodge Charger.... Liked the look of this new toy from the beginning..  But, when I stook it to my range  I fell in love with it.... Even with a cheep red dot scope the pistol preformed great.... It is a winner on all of my score sheets....
    Sincerly
Duffy St.Pierre</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got the 10/22 Charger as a gift a few weeks after I bought a Dodge Charger&#8230;. Liked the look of this new toy from the beginning..  But, when I stook it to my range  I fell in love with it&#8230;. Even with a cheep red dot scope the pistol preformed great&#8230;. It is a winner on all of my score sheets&#8230;.<br />
    Sincerly<br />
Duffy St.Pierre</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruger Fan</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/21/ruger-charger-pistol/#comment-6721</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruger Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/21/ruger-charger-pistol/#comment-6721</guid>
		<description>Was able to shoot inside a quarter sized group with 10 rounds (full mag) at 25 yards with 3-9x rifle scope without even trying. The gun was very impressive and a lot of fun to shoot. The bipod really makes this a great bench top pistol, which is what I believe it was designed for. I find it rather difficult and cumbersome trying to shoot this without a bench or bipod. But even shooting without the bench its more accurate then any pistol out there. I believe that I could easily get a better grouping with a little practice and some better ammo. Very nice target pistol. I&#039;m certain that if you shoot small game this will be a nice sniper head shot shooter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was able to shoot inside a quarter sized group with 10 rounds (full mag) at 25 yards with 3-9x rifle scope without even trying. The gun was very impressive and a lot of fun to shoot. The bipod really makes this a great bench top pistol, which is what I believe it was designed for. I find it rather difficult and cumbersome trying to shoot this without a bench or bipod. But even shooting without the bench its more accurate then any pistol out there. I believe that I could easily get a better grouping with a little practice and some better ammo. Very nice target pistol. I&#8217;m certain that if you shoot small game this will be a nice sniper head shot shooter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/21/ruger-charger-pistol/#comment-4308</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 19:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/21/ruger-charger-pistol/#comment-4308</guid>
		<description>The reason a rifle cannot be converted to a pistol is the Firearms act of 1934. Back in the days of the gangsters running booze into cities like Chicago, they would saw off the barrels of rifles and shotguns to carry under their jackets or coats. A short barrel rifle would have much more power than any handgun at the time, (Even the .357 Mag did not come about until 1935). So the feds passed the firearms act of 1934, (The first of the laws that started the erosion of our 2nd Amendment rights), this law made sawed off rifles, shotguns and full auto firearms illegal unless the person wishing to own one paid a $200.00 dollar tax, passed a background check and was approved by local law enforcement and the feds. As long as the receiver was registered as a handgun when it was manufactured, it will always have to remain a rifle. You can buy a 10/22 receiver from some of the aftermarket mfgs, and register it as a handgun, and build your own, but the cost would be more than just buying a Charger.
The T/C Contender can be bought as a pistol and then be changed to a rifle and back to a handgun. However if you buy the Contnder as a rifle, you can get a ten year prison sentence if you install one of the handgun barrels shorter than 16 inches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason a rifle cannot be converted to a pistol is the Firearms act of 1934. Back in the days of the gangsters running booze into cities like Chicago, they would saw off the barrels of rifles and shotguns to carry under their jackets or coats. A short barrel rifle would have much more power than any handgun at the time, (Even the .357 Mag did not come about until 1935). So the feds passed the firearms act of 1934, (The first of the laws that started the erosion of our 2nd Amendment rights), this law made sawed off rifles, shotguns and full auto firearms illegal unless the person wishing to own one paid a $200.00 dollar tax, passed a background check and was approved by local law enforcement and the feds. As long as the receiver was registered as a handgun when it was manufactured, it will always have to remain a rifle. You can buy a 10/22 receiver from some of the aftermarket mfgs, and register it as a handgun, and build your own, but the cost would be more than just buying a Charger.<br />
The T/C Contender can be bought as a pistol and then be changed to a rifle and back to a handgun. However if you buy the Contnder as a rifle, you can get a ten year prison sentence if you install one of the handgun barrels shorter than 16 inches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/21/ruger-charger-pistol/#comment-3244</link>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/21/ruger-charger-pistol/#comment-3244</guid>
		<description>that is a beautiful pistol, and it looks like a blast to shoot, almost like a laser gun! and that stock is really interesting and looks very comfortable to hold. why is it that it is legal to convert a pistol to a rifle, but not the other way around?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that is a beautiful pistol, and it looks like a blast to shoot, almost like a laser gun! and that stock is really interesting and looks very comfortable to hold. why is it that it is legal to convert a pistol to a rifle, but not the other way around?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/21/ruger-charger-pistol/#comment-2816</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 23:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/21/ruger-charger-pistol/#comment-2816</guid>
		<description>Purchased a charger at a local gun show. Mounted an NC Star 2x7 pistol scope and with the cheap 550 round brick from Wal-Mart after sighting in shot a five round group at 50 yds that could be covered with a nickel. I am considering one of the  14&quot;aluma-lite barrels. Very pleased and shoots nearly as well as my TC with the 14&quot; stainless match barrel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Purchased a charger at a local gun show. Mounted an NC Star 2&#215;7 pistol scope and with the cheap 550 round brick from Wal-Mart after sighting in shot a five round group at 50 yds that could be covered with a nickel. I am considering one of the  14&#8243;aluma-lite barrels. Very pleased and shoots nearly as well as my TC with the 14&#8243; stainless match barrel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BBinKC</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/21/ruger-charger-pistol/#comment-2260</link>
		<dc:creator>BBinKC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/21/ruger-charger-pistol/#comment-2260</guid>
		<description>You cannot legally convert a 10/22 rifle to a pistol. Once a receiver is sold as either a handgun or a rifle that&#039;s what it is forever and a 10/22 receiver sold as a rifle dropped into a Charger setup would be an illegal short barreled rifle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You cannot legally convert a 10/22 rifle to a pistol. Once a receiver is sold as either a handgun or a rifle that&#8217;s what it is forever and a 10/22 receiver sold as a rifle dropped into a Charger setup would be an illegal short barreled rifle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/21/ruger-charger-pistol/#comment-2197</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 20:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/21/ruger-charger-pistol/#comment-2197</guid>
		<description>I just seen the charger pistol in the cabells catalog it looks very cool and its nice to see ruger come up with a new product like that . they should come out with a kit to convert a 10-22 rifle to a pistol .
Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just seen the charger pistol in the cabells catalog it looks very cool and its nice to see ruger come up with a new product like that . they should come out with a kit to convert a 10-22 rifle to a pistol .<br />
Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: js</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/21/ruger-charger-pistol/#comment-2158</link>
		<dc:creator>js</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 07:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/21/ruger-charger-pistol/#comment-2158</guid>
		<description>If you were to custom build a long barrel to the CFP pistol grip, making a legal rifle barrel length would the grip need to be changed to a rifle stock/pistol grip to make it CA legal?  any thing else I&#039;m missing to make the ruger pistol legal? you input is appreciated...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you were to custom build a long barrel to the CFP pistol grip, making a legal rifle barrel length would the grip need to be changed to a rifle stock/pistol grip to make it CA legal?  any thing else I&#8217;m missing to make the ruger pistol legal? you input is appreciated&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: So Bummed</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/21/ruger-charger-pistol/#comment-1775</link>
		<dc:creator>So Bummed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 05:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/21/ruger-charger-pistol/#comment-1775</guid>
		<description>Love this pistol but live in California... so unfair.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love this pistol but live in California&#8230; so unfair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Footpounds &#187; Ruger Charger</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/21/ruger-charger-pistol/#comment-913</link>
		<dc:creator>Footpounds &#187; Ruger Charger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 21:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/21/ruger-charger-pistol/#comment-913</guid>
		<description>[...] The Firearm Blog has a nice page of Charger links. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Firearm Blog has a nice page of Charger links. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/21/ruger-charger-pistol/#comment-880</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 01:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/21/ruger-charger-pistol/#comment-880</guid>
		<description>Thanks dogon1013. I will update the blog entry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks dogon1013. I will update the blog entry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dogon1013</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/21/ruger-charger-pistol/#comment-879</link>
		<dc:creator>dogon1013</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 01:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/21/ruger-charger-pistol/#comment-879</guid>
		<description>AOW (any other weapon) is a federal designation, NOT a California state designation. this is not an AOW, it is a pistol.

California considers it an Assault weapon under their assault weapons ban definition. according to California, any pistol with a magazine outside of the pistol grip is an assault weapon. the Ruger would also need the loaded chamber indicator and magazine disconnect to be sold in CA (if it wasn&#039;t allready banned because it is an assault weapon according to California).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AOW (any other weapon) is a federal designation, NOT a California state designation. this is not an AOW, it is a pistol.</p>
<p>California considers it an Assault weapon under their assault weapons ban definition. according to California, any pistol with a magazine outside of the pistol grip is an assault weapon. the Ruger would also need the loaded chamber indicator and magazine disconnect to be sold in CA (if it wasn&#8217;t allready banned because it is an assault weapon according to California).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
