<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ruger Charger Pistol</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/21/ruger-charger-pistol/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/21/ruger-charger-pistol/</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: nick</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/21/ruger-charger-pistol/#comment-3244</link>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/21/ruger-charger-pistol/#comment-3244</guid>
		<description>that is a beautiful pistol, and it looks like a blast to shoot, almost like a laser gun! and that stock is really interesting and looks very comfortable to hold. why is it that it is legal to convert a pistol to a rifle, but not the other way around?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that is a beautiful pistol, and it looks like a blast to shoot, almost like a laser gun! and that stock is really interesting and looks very comfortable to hold. why is it that it is legal to convert a pistol to a rifle, but not the other way around?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/21/ruger-charger-pistol/#comment-2816</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 23:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/21/ruger-charger-pistol/#comment-2816</guid>
		<description>Purchased a charger at a local gun show. Mounted an NC Star 2x7 pistol scope and with the cheap 550 round brick from Wal-Mart after sighting in shot a five round group at 50 yds that could be covered with a nickel. I am considering one of the  14"aluma-lite barrels. Very pleased and shoots nearly as well as my TC with the 14" stainless match barrel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Purchased a charger at a local gun show. Mounted an NC Star 2&#215;7 pistol scope and with the cheap 550 round brick from Wal-Mart after sighting in shot a five round group at 50 yds that could be covered with a nickel. I am considering one of the  14&#8243;aluma-lite barrels. Very pleased and shoots nearly as well as my TC with the 14&#8243; stainless match barrel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BBinKC</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/21/ruger-charger-pistol/#comment-2260</link>
		<dc:creator>BBinKC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/21/ruger-charger-pistol/#comment-2260</guid>
		<description>You cannot legally convert a 10/22 rifle to a pistol. Once a receiver is sold as either a handgun or a rifle that's what it is forever and a 10/22 receiver sold as a rifle dropped into a Charger setup would be an illegal short barreled rifle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You cannot legally convert a 10/22 rifle to a pistol. Once a receiver is sold as either a handgun or a rifle that&#8217;s what it is forever and a 10/22 receiver sold as a rifle dropped into a Charger setup would be an illegal short barreled rifle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/21/ruger-charger-pistol/#comment-2197</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 20:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/21/ruger-charger-pistol/#comment-2197</guid>
		<description>I just seen the charger pistol in the cabells catalog it looks very cool and its nice to see ruger come up with a new product like that . they should come out with a kit to convert a 10-22 rifle to a pistol .
Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just seen the charger pistol in the cabells catalog it looks very cool and its nice to see ruger come up with a new product like that . they should come out with a kit to convert a 10-22 rifle to a pistol .<br />
Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: js</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/21/ruger-charger-pistol/#comment-2158</link>
		<dc:creator>js</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 07:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/21/ruger-charger-pistol/#comment-2158</guid>
		<description>If you were to custom build a long barrel to the CFP pistol grip, making a legal rifle barrel length would the grip need to be changed to a rifle stock/pistol grip to make it CA legal?  any thing else I'm missing to make the ruger pistol legal? you input is appreciated...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you were to custom build a long barrel to the CFP pistol grip, making a legal rifle barrel length would the grip need to be changed to a rifle stock/pistol grip to make it CA legal?  any thing else I&#8217;m missing to make the ruger pistol legal? you input is appreciated&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: So Bummed</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/21/ruger-charger-pistol/#comment-1775</link>
		<dc:creator>So Bummed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 05:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/21/ruger-charger-pistol/#comment-1775</guid>
		<description>Love this pistol but live in California... so unfair.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love this pistol but live in California&#8230; so unfair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Footpounds &#187; Ruger Charger</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/21/ruger-charger-pistol/#comment-913</link>
		<dc:creator>Footpounds &#187; Ruger Charger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 21:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/21/ruger-charger-pistol/#comment-913</guid>
		<description>[...] The Firearm Blog has a nice page of Charger links. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Firearm Blog has a nice page of Charger links. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/21/ruger-charger-pistol/#comment-880</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 01:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/21/ruger-charger-pistol/#comment-880</guid>
		<description>Thanks dogon1013. I will update the blog entry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks dogon1013. I will update the blog entry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dogon1013</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/21/ruger-charger-pistol/#comment-879</link>
		<dc:creator>dogon1013</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 01:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/21/ruger-charger-pistol/#comment-879</guid>
		<description>AOW (any other weapon) is a federal designation, NOT a California state designation. this is not an AOW, it is a pistol.

California considers it an Assault weapon under their assault weapons ban definition. according to California, any pistol with a magazine outside of the pistol grip is an assault weapon. the Ruger would also need the loaded chamber indicator and magazine disconnect to be sold in CA (if it wasn't allready banned because it is an assault weapon according to California).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AOW (any other weapon) is a federal designation, NOT a California state designation. this is not an AOW, it is a pistol.</p>
<p>California considers it an Assault weapon under their assault weapons ban definition. according to California, any pistol with a magazine outside of the pistol grip is an assault weapon. the Ruger would also need the loaded chamber indicator and magazine disconnect to be sold in CA (if it wasn&#8217;t allready banned because it is an assault weapon according to California).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
