Comments on: Quiet Shotgun http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/18/quiet-shotgun/ Firearms not Politics Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:18:29 +1300 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: komrad http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/18/quiet-shotgun/#comment-14003 komrad Fri, 04 Sep 2009 02:41:58 +0000 http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/18/quiet-shotgun/#comment-14003 How does it work? Is it ported? Can I have it? How does it work? Is it ported? Can I have it?

]]> By: Aaron http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/18/quiet-shotgun/#comment-13008 Aaron Sat, 08 Aug 2009 17:42:06 +0000 http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/18/quiet-shotgun/#comment-13008 What's sad is that it is necessary to go to such lengths (in this case, 7 feet) to get around draconian silencer laws and regulations. What’s sad is that it is necessary to go to such lengths (in this case, 7 feet) to get around draconian silencer laws and regulations.

]]> By: Eric Shelton http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/18/quiet-shotgun/#comment-10545 Eric Shelton Mon, 08 Jun 2009 02:54:19 +0000 http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/18/quiet-shotgun/#comment-10545 Respectfully disagree, Thomas. That would make my Henry lever action carbine "suppressed" when I fire .22 Shorts. It's so quiet I don't even need ear pro. I've used louder staple guns. So should I NFA register my stock Henry because of a barrel to powder ratio? Respectfully disagree, Thomas. That would make my Henry lever action carbine “suppressed” when I fire .22 Shorts. It’s so quiet I don’t even need ear pro. I’ve used louder staple guns. So should I NFA register my stock Henry because of a barrel to powder ratio?

]]> By: Thomas http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/18/quiet-shotgun/#comment-9998 Thomas Wed, 27 May 2009 21:48:28 +0000 http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/18/quiet-shotgun/#comment-9998 This is technically a sound suppressor. Could get in serious trouble if it is ruled such without the $200 tax stamp. This is technically a sound suppressor. Could get in serious trouble if it is ruled such without the $200 tax stamp.

]]> By: Steve http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/18/quiet-shotgun/#comment-868 Steve Wed, 19 Dec 2007 02:29:40 +0000 http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/18/quiet-shotgun/#comment-868 or worse they will increase the minimum length to 6 feet! Obviously no one needs a barrel less than 6 feet, only criminals and terrorists :P or worse they will increase the minimum length to 6 feet!

Obviously no one needs a barrel less than 6 feet, only criminals and terrorists :P

]]> By: Yuri Orlov http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/18/quiet-shotgun/#comment-867 Yuri Orlov Wed, 19 Dec 2007 02:06:55 +0000 http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/12/18/quiet-shotgun/#comment-867 That's amazing! Just watch, soon the BATFE will issue rules about maximum barrel length too... That’s amazing! Just watch, soon the BATFE will issue rules about maximum barrel length too…

]]>