<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ruger likely developing an AR-15</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/27/ruger-likely-developing-an-ar-15/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/27/ruger-likely-developing-an-ar-15/</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:18:29 +1300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: viridari</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/27/ruger-likely-developing-an-ar-15/#comment-15057</link>
		<dc:creator>viridari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 03:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/27/ruger-likely-developing-an-ar-15/#comment-15057</guid>
		<description>Fred,

The second amendment is not about hunting deer. &#039;nuff said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fred,</p>
<p>The second amendment is not about hunting deer. &#8217;nuff said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raul</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/27/ruger-likely-developing-an-ar-15/#comment-9826</link>
		<dc:creator>Raul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 10:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/27/ruger-likely-developing-an-ar-15/#comment-9826</guid>
		<description>Price tag is out: $2,000!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Price tag is out: $2,000!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/27/ruger-likely-developing-an-ar-15/#comment-8276</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 18:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/27/ruger-likely-developing-an-ar-15/#comment-8276</guid>
		<description>REgrets Cymond, I think at this point it is a non-starter. The train has left town. The ar panic will end and then maybe will we see this ar</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>REgrets Cymond, I think at this point it is a non-starter. The train has left town. The ar panic will end and then maybe will we see this ar</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cymond</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/27/ruger-likely-developing-an-ar-15/#comment-7065</link>
		<dc:creator>Cymond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 04:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/27/ruger-likely-developing-an-ar-15/#comment-7065</guid>
		<description>First, Ruger recently had an all-black NRA special edition of the Mini-14 with full-cap mags (20? 30? I don&#039;t remember) and a 16 inch barrel. They&#039;ve released a (cloned) pocket pistol and a new ultra-light carry revolver. It seems the Ruger Co has reversed its prior stance on civilian armament. 

Second, who cares if Ruger supplies full cap magazines? Assuming that the hypothetical Ruger ar15 is chambered in 223/5.56, then magazines will be readily avaiable from other companies. The only issue I would see is for the more specialized cartridges like 6.5 Creedmore or 300 RCM. 

Personally, I&#039;ve always wondered why the Mini hasn&#039;t ever been redesigned at some point to take ar15 magazines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, Ruger recently had an all-black NRA special edition of the Mini-14 with full-cap mags (20? 30? I don&#8217;t remember) and a 16 inch barrel. They&#8217;ve released a (cloned) pocket pistol and a new ultra-light carry revolver. It seems the Ruger Co has reversed its prior stance on civilian armament. </p>
<p>Second, who cares if Ruger supplies full cap magazines? Assuming that the hypothetical Ruger ar15 is chambered in 223/5.56, then magazines will be readily avaiable from other companies. The only issue I would see is for the more specialized cartridges like 6.5 Creedmore or 300 RCM. </p>
<p>Personally, I&#8217;ve always wondered why the Mini hasn&#8217;t ever been redesigned at some point to take ar15 magazines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cmblake6</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/27/ruger-likely-developing-an-ar-15/#comment-3922</link>
		<dc:creator>cmblake6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 14:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/27/ruger-likely-developing-an-ar-15/#comment-3922</guid>
		<description>Most definitely agree with the Creedmoor round. Everything I&#039;ve read shows it a bit better. As for the .204, I&#039;ve heard mixed reviews. And I also agree with a &quot;Maxi-14&quot; concept. I&#039;d like a Mini, but the price has severely increased over the years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most definitely agree with the Creedmoor round. Everything I&#8217;ve read shows it a bit better. As for the .204, I&#8217;ve heard mixed reviews. And I also agree with a &#8220;Maxi-14&#8243; concept. I&#8217;d like a Mini, but the price has severely increased over the years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/27/ruger-likely-developing-an-ar-15/#comment-3829</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 13:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/27/ruger-likely-developing-an-ar-15/#comment-3829</guid>
		<description>You raise good points cmblake6, particularly as it relates to eh obamessiah. If I were at the helm of Ruger, and I am not, I would introduce an AR10 platform in my lineup. It probably wouldnt be the 260 Remington, but instead the 6.5 Creedmoor to support the good friends at Hornady. It would also be in their best interest to do something to boost the popularity of the new 300 RCM or even better the 338 RCM. I personally own a 338 RCM and brought it to Africa this past year and ahd great success, Toasted a 14.5&#039; croc with a brain shot from a pretty fair distance. Getting back to the main point. In addition to the AR10 they will liely also introduce am AR15 with 204 Ruger being featured. Curious to see if they actually come upo with a full size M14</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You raise good points cmblake6, particularly as it relates to eh obamessiah. If I were at the helm of Ruger, and I am not, I would introduce an AR10 platform in my lineup. It probably wouldnt be the 260 Remington, but instead the 6.5 Creedmoor to support the good friends at Hornady. It would also be in their best interest to do something to boost the popularity of the new 300 RCM or even better the 338 RCM. I personally own a 338 RCM and brought it to Africa this past year and ahd great success, Toasted a 14.5&#8242; croc with a brain shot from a pretty fair distance. Getting back to the main point. In addition to the AR10 they will liely also introduce am AR15 with 204 Ruger being featured. Curious to see if they actually come upo with a full size M14</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cmblake6</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/27/ruger-likely-developing-an-ar-15/#comment-3818</link>
		<dc:creator>cmblake6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 06:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/27/ruger-likely-developing-an-ar-15/#comment-3818</guid>
		<description>Still not seeing it. If Ruger does finally put this thing out, it will be good. But the next thing to wonder is if it will be allowed in the new and improved USSA of TEH OBAMESSIAH. You know his record, never met a gun control bill he didn&#039;t like. And 5 RINOs have already come up with a bill that makes Slick Willies tame by comparison. Stand Ready. Those who&#039;ve ever sworn the Oath, remember it.
Back to the rifle, I&#039;d like to see it piston driven and various calibers. If they make an AR-10 version in .260, I won&#039;t be able to say no.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still not seeing it. If Ruger does finally put this thing out, it will be good. But the next thing to wonder is if it will be allowed in the new and improved USSA of TEH OBAMESSIAH. You know his record, never met a gun control bill he didn&#8217;t like. And 5 RINOs have already come up with a bill that makes Slick Willies tame by comparison. Stand Ready. Those who&#8217;ve ever sworn the Oath, remember it.<br />
Back to the rifle, I&#8217;d like to see it piston driven and various calibers. If they make an AR-10 version in .260, I won&#8217;t be able to say no.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/27/ruger-likely-developing-an-ar-15/#comment-3805</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/27/ruger-likely-developing-an-ar-15/#comment-3805</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m hopeful Ruger can pull it off and produce a quality firearm at a market competititve rate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m hopeful Ruger can pull it off and produce a quality firearm at a market competititve rate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/27/ruger-likely-developing-an-ar-15/#comment-3676</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/27/ruger-likely-developing-an-ar-15/#comment-3676</guid>
		<description>Fred

I currently own 2 .223 caliber rifles with hugh cap magazines. I also own 
some bolt action rifles with multiple round magazines. Deer season this
year lasted just one shot on opening day, so does this mean I should not have the .223&#039;s with high cap magazines??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fred</p>
<p>I currently own 2 .223 caliber rifles with hugh cap magazines. I also own<br />
some bolt action rifles with multiple round magazines. Deer season this<br />
year lasted just one shot on opening day, so does this mean I should not have the .223&#8217;s with high cap magazines??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cmblake6</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/27/ruger-likely-developing-an-ar-15/#comment-2882</link>
		<dc:creator>cmblake6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 23:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/27/ruger-likely-developing-an-ar-15/#comment-2882</guid>
		<description>Wonder what kind of price tag?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonder what kind of price tag?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miguel</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/27/ruger-likely-developing-an-ar-15/#comment-2874</link>
		<dc:creator>miguel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 17:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/27/ruger-likely-developing-an-ar-15/#comment-2874</guid>
		<description>people ruger is again selling 20 rounds  mags for the mini 14 ... its not  unreasonable they  will sell 20 mags for AR 15 .....I been dreaming for   a  ruger AR15 for sometime.   miguel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>people ruger is again selling 20 rounds  mags for the mini 14 &#8230; its not  unreasonable they  will sell 20 mags for AR 15 &#8230;..I been dreaming for   a  ruger AR15 for sometime.   miguel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ME</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/27/ruger-likely-developing-an-ar-15/#comment-2254</link>
		<dc:creator>ME</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 23:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/27/ruger-likely-developing-an-ar-15/#comment-2254</guid>
		<description>nice try fred, but the magazine capacity of one&#039;s weapon has nothing to do with one&#039;s quality of marksmanship. you argue like the &quot;gunguys&quot;--nonsensical and as usual of the mark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice try fred, but the magazine capacity of one&#8217;s weapon has nothing to do with one&#8217;s quality of marksmanship. you argue like the &#8220;gunguys&#8221;&#8211;nonsensical and as usual of the mark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cmblake6</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/27/ruger-likely-developing-an-ar-15/#comment-1916</link>
		<dc:creator>cmblake6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 23:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/27/ruger-likely-developing-an-ar-15/#comment-1916</guid>
		<description>I think Bill Ruger did what he thought he had to do at the time. Ruger, Co. has still continued to build fine guns and provide good service. And now they&#039;ve gotten better so we can stop holding THAT glitch from the past against them. Yeah, they&#039;ve pulled their heads out, and it&#039;s good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Bill Ruger did what he thought he had to do at the time. Ruger, Co. has still continued to build fine guns and provide good service. And now they&#8217;ve gotten better so we can stop holding THAT glitch from the past against them. Yeah, they&#8217;ve pulled their heads out, and it&#8217;s good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leucoandro</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/27/ruger-likely-developing-an-ar-15/#comment-1912</link>
		<dc:creator>Leucoandro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 05:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/27/ruger-likely-developing-an-ar-15/#comment-1912</guid>
		<description>I find this rather entertaining.  Everyone is bashing Ruger for the Magazine Limit, when Bill Ruger was acting as the Spokesman for SAMMI and NSSF. For those of you that do not know, SAMMI Members include Winchester Ammunition division of Olin, Browning Arms, Federal Cartridge, Hercules, Hornady Manufacturing, Marlin Firearms, O.F. Mossberg, Omark Industries, Remington Arms, Smith &amp; Wesson, Thompson/Center and Weatherby.

Maybe if people used the Internet back then like they do now, they would know this.  But also, maybe if people understood the political climate of the time, they would understand that the temporary magazine restrictions probably saved the country (AKA all of us) from having many, if not all, semi-auto&#039;s banned all together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find this rather entertaining.  Everyone is bashing Ruger for the Magazine Limit, when Bill Ruger was acting as the Spokesman for SAMMI and NSSF. For those of you that do not know, SAMMI Members include Winchester Ammunition division of Olin, Browning Arms, Federal Cartridge, Hercules, Hornady Manufacturing, Marlin Firearms, O.F. Mossberg, Omark Industries, Remington Arms, Smith &amp; Wesson, Thompson/Center and Weatherby.</p>
<p>Maybe if people used the Internet back then like they do now, they would know this.  But also, maybe if people understood the political climate of the time, they would understand that the temporary magazine restrictions probably saved the country (AKA all of us) from having many, if not all, semi-auto&#8217;s banned all together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cmblake6</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/27/ruger-likely-developing-an-ar-15/#comment-1632</link>
		<dc:creator>cmblake6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 01:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/27/ruger-likely-developing-an-ar-15/#comment-1632</guid>
		<description>Not to mention, the &quot;NEW AND IMPROVED&quot; Ruger company is now selling 20 and 30(I think) mags for the Mini 14. I think the new management is much better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to mention, the &#8220;NEW AND IMPROVED&#8221; Ruger company is now selling 20 and 30(I think) mags for the Mini 14. I think the new management is much better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Friend</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/27/ruger-likely-developing-an-ar-15/#comment-1622</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Friend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 15:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/27/ruger-likely-developing-an-ar-15/#comment-1622</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think any of us want someone telling us how many rounds we are permited to load in our magazines. If Ruger makes an AR platform, you know they&#039;ll provide 30rd mags. After all, they just marketed a striker fired piston with a 17 +1 capacity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think any of us want someone telling us how many rounds we are permited to load in our magazines. If Ruger makes an AR platform, you know they&#8217;ll provide 30rd mags. After all, they just marketed a striker fired piston with a 17 +1 capacity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cmblake6</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/27/ruger-likely-developing-an-ar-15/#comment-1375</link>
		<dc:creator>cmblake6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 03:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/27/ruger-likely-developing-an-ar-15/#comment-1375</guid>
		<description>Well, if it&#039;s 6.8 SPC I want one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, if it&#8217;s 6.8 SPC I want one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Hafemeister</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/27/ruger-likely-developing-an-ar-15/#comment-628</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Hafemeister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 03:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/27/ruger-likely-developing-an-ar-15/#comment-628</guid>
		<description>Fred,
I don&#039;t really care how many rounds your magazines hold. Please let me use as big a magazine as I want to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fred,<br />
I don&#8217;t really care how many rounds your magazines hold. Please let me use as big a magazine as I want to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/27/ruger-likely-developing-an-ar-15/#comment-569</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 00:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/27/ruger-likely-developing-an-ar-15/#comment-569</guid>
		<description>Hi Fred. I know what you are saying but some sportsman require more than 10 round mags in order to be competitive, as well as personal choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Fred. I know what you are saying but some sportsman require more than 10 round mags in order to be competitive, as well as personal choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FRED</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/27/ruger-likely-developing-an-ar-15/#comment-566</link>
		<dc:creator>FRED</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/27/ruger-likely-developing-an-ar-15/#comment-566</guid>
		<description>I have never seen so much BS about how many rounds a Rifle on Pistol will hold. We must have a lot of bad marksmen in this country. Why else do you need a magazine to hold 30,50 or a 100 rounds. I have had guns all my life and my first was a single shot .22 If you can&#039;t hit something in 10 rounds you had better give up shooting!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have never seen so much BS about how many rounds a Rifle on Pistol will hold. We must have a lot of bad marksmen in this country. Why else do you need a magazine to hold 30,50 or a 100 rounds. I have had guns all my life and my first was a single shot .22 If you can&#8217;t hit something in 10 rounds you had better give up shooting!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Unforgiving Minute &#187; The voice of (one) customer.</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/27/ruger-likely-developing-an-ar-15/#comment-286</link>
		<dc:creator>The Unforgiving Minute &#187; The voice of (one) customer.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 06:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/27/ruger-likely-developing-an-ar-15/#comment-286</guid>
		<description>[...] The Firearm Blog covered Ruger&#8217;s poor Q3 results and the CEO&#8217;s letter to shareholders. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Firearm Blog covered Ruger&#8217;s poor Q3 results and the CEO&#8217;s letter to shareholders. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DirtCrashr</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/27/ruger-likely-developing-an-ar-15/#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator>DirtCrashr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 16:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/27/ruger-likely-developing-an-ar-15/#comment-244</guid>
		<description>Since it&#039;s Ruger they&#039;ll probably chamber it in Ruger-specific cartridges (.204 Ruger, .375 Ruger, .480 Ruger?..) that only a few will purchase, just to say, &quot;See it&#039;s an EBR and nobody (hunter) wants one.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since it&#8217;s Ruger they&#8217;ll probably chamber it in Ruger-specific cartridges (.204 Ruger, .375 Ruger, .480 Ruger?..) that only a few will purchase, just to say, &#8220;See it&#8217;s an EBR and nobody (hunter) wants one.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/27/ruger-likely-developing-an-ar-15/#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 21:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/27/ruger-likely-developing-an-ar-15/#comment-240</guid>
		<description>I think they would have. Although I would be surprised if any gun companies in the future are willing to risk the backlash from making Bill Ruger/Zumbo style comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they would have. Although I would be surprised if any gun companies in the future are willing to risk the backlash from making Bill Ruger/Zumbo style comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: viridari</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/27/ruger-likely-developing-an-ar-15/#comment-239</link>
		<dc:creator>viridari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 21:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/27/ruger-likely-developing-an-ar-15/#comment-239</guid>
		<description>If they make it, they&#039;ll only provide 10 round magazine, max.  And no &quot;evil&quot; features.

Did Ruger ever stop and think that maybe, just maybe, they alienated a nice subsection of the gun culture?  If the Internet had been as ubiquitous in 1994 as it is today, Ruger could have been Zumbo&#039;d for their stance on &quot;assault rifles&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they make it, they&#8217;ll only provide 10 round magazine, max.  And no &#8220;evil&#8221; features.</p>
<p>Did Ruger ever stop and think that maybe, just maybe, they alienated a nice subsection of the gun culture?  If the Internet had been as ubiquitous in 1994 as it is today, Ruger could have been Zumbo&#8217;d for their stance on &#8220;assault rifles&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DirtCrashr</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/27/ruger-likely-developing-an-ar-15/#comment-234</link>
		<dc:creator>DirtCrashr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/27/ruger-likely-developing-an-ar-15/#comment-234</guid>
		<description>Winchester should have done it - that brand-name script on an old Garand or Carbine or anything about doubles its price, and had they put it on an AR they would have made mad-money, hand over fist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Winchester should have done it &#8211; that brand-name script on an old Garand or Carbine or anything about doubles its price, and had they put it on an AR they would have made mad-money, hand over fist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
