<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Remington R-15, the new AR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 05:46:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Heath</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-28911</link>
		<dc:creator>Heath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 02:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-28911</guid>
		<description>You bet.  That&#039;s a great looking rifle.  Let us know how you like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You bet.  That&#8217;s a great looking rifle.  Let us know how you like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neptune</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-28901</link>
		<dc:creator>neptune</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-28901</guid>
		<description>thanks heath i decided to buy the remington r15 it is already camo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks heath i decided to buy the remington r15 it is already camo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-28441</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 23:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-28441</guid>
		<description>The R-15 interests me, but as an old bolt gun sniper I am a hard sell. My biggest concern is the rifles abiltiy to hold a zero.  Some of the &quot;black rifles&quot; have failed miserably in this category.

Even with my bolt guns I check zero at least every 2-3 days when &quot;at work&quot;. A gun that requires constant tweeking under careful but normal use is unaccepatable. I have rifles that don&#039;t have to be touched from year to year. Others that could not make it though the day and stay &quot;on&quot;. And none of these were cheap guns.

Many of you here seem to be fairly &quot;new owners&quot; in terms of how much you have used the rifles so far. I am interested in an opinion from you guys that have benched the gun, taken it &quot;on the road&quot; and then benched it again to check zero.

Any shared experiences/opinions would be appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The R-15 interests me, but as an old bolt gun sniper I am a hard sell. My biggest concern is the rifles abiltiy to hold a zero.  Some of the &#8220;black rifles&#8221; have failed miserably in this category.</p>
<p>Even with my bolt guns I check zero at least every 2-3 days when &#8220;at work&#8221;. A gun that requires constant tweeking under careful but normal use is unaccepatable. I have rifles that don&#8217;t have to be touched from year to year. Others that could not make it though the day and stay &#8220;on&#8221;. And none of these were cheap guns.</p>
<p>Many of you here seem to be fairly &#8220;new owners&#8221; in terms of how much you have used the rifles so far. I am interested in an opinion from you guys that have benched the gun, taken it &#8220;on the road&#8221; and then benched it again to check zero.</p>
<p>Any shared experiences/opinions would be appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heath</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-28353</link>
		<dc:creator>Heath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 12:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-28353</guid>
		<description>Neptune,

You can do it a couple ways.  You can have it dipped like they do here http://www.dynamicfinishes.com/ or you can buy a few cans of paint and do it yourself in about an hour http://www.predatorwild.com/How-Camo-Paint-Your-Rifle-t4758.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neptune,</p>
<p>You can do it a couple ways.  You can have it dipped like they do here <a href="http://www.dynamicfinishes.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.dynamicfinishes.com/</a> or you can buy a few cans of paint and do it yourself in about an hour <a href="http://www.predatorwild.com/How-Camo-Paint-Your-Rifle-t4758.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.predatorwild.com/How-Camo-Paint-Your-Rifle-t4758.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neptune</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-28317</link>
		<dc:creator>neptune</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 02:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-28317</guid>
		<description>can you paint a black ar camo? if so what kind of paint</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can you paint a black ar camo? if so what kind of paint</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Matney</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-27804</link>
		<dc:creator>David Matney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-27804</guid>
		<description>Can anyone please confirm the correct harris bi-pod model for the R-15? I&#039;m looking at the following model, but want to make sure; 
1. it will work on the R-15? (Carbine CS Model) 
2. it will not mar (scratch) the camo finish?

Model: HBLM-S 
Extends 9&quot; to 13&quot; with Leg Notches, &quot;S&quot; Series (Swivels)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can anyone please confirm the correct harris bi-pod model for the R-15? I&#8217;m looking at the following model, but want to make sure;<br />
1. it will work on the R-15? (Carbine CS Model)<br />
2. it will not mar (scratch) the camo finish?</p>
<p>Model: HBLM-S<br />
Extends 9&#8243; to 13&#8243; with Leg Notches, &#8220;S&#8221; Series (Swivels)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Matney</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-27372</link>
		<dc:creator>David Matney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-27372</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the tip Frankster! 
I have read from several gun writers who frequently include Wolf ammo in their test results, typically with good/consistent results. Which is why the “excessive fouling” using Wolf somewhat surprised me…

Thanks again... dm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the tip Frankster!<br />
I have read from several gun writers who frequently include Wolf ammo in their test results, typically with good/consistent results. Which is why the “excessive fouling” using Wolf somewhat surprised me…</p>
<p>Thanks again&#8230; dm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frankster</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-27366</link>
		<dc:creator>Frankster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-27366</guid>
		<description>David Matney I have shot 100 plus rounds though my R-15 and had no problem cleaning it. Though I use a teflon oil on the gun before I went shotting that I am sure made cleaning a whole lot easier. If you use something like Rem oil that has teflon in it, even if the ammo shots dirty you sure have not problem cleaning it. By the way I found Wolf ammo to shot great though my R-15.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Matney I have shot 100 plus rounds though my R-15 and had no problem cleaning it. Though I use a teflon oil on the gun before I went shotting that I am sure made cleaning a whole lot easier. If you use something like Rem oil that has teflon in it, even if the ammo shots dirty you sure have not problem cleaning it. By the way I found Wolf ammo to shot great though my R-15.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Matney</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-27332</link>
		<dc:creator>David Matney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-27332</guid>
		<description>Thanks Monk! 
Your response brings up another issue that I would like to hit on. I read a recent article in Guns &amp; Ammo where a gun writer/reviewer stated that “Wolf” brand ammo made cleaning AR’s much more difficult compared to most other brands. Can anyone corroborate (or dispel) his statement that “Wolf” is dirtier burning ammo?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Monk!<br />
Your response brings up another issue that I would like to hit on. I read a recent article in Guns &amp; Ammo where a gun writer/reviewer stated that “Wolf” brand ammo made cleaning AR’s much more difficult compared to most other brands. Can anyone corroborate (or dispel) his statement that “Wolf” is dirtier burning ammo?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monk</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-27252</link>
		<dc:creator>Monk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-27252</guid>
		<description>I have the vtr 15 cs and love it.I use wolf .223 55gr and have not had a misfire yet.I haven&#039;t shot more than a 100 rds.,but I would not trade it for anything.It is very accurate and cycles flawlessly.Mine has multi stamped for caliber on it,so I believe 5.56 mm is okay to shoot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the vtr 15 cs and love it.I use wolf .223 55gr and have not had a misfire yet.I haven&#8217;t shot more than a 100 rds.,but I would not trade it for anything.It is very accurate and cycles flawlessly.Mine has multi stamped for caliber on it,so I believe 5.56 mm is okay to shoot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Matney</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-27242</link>
		<dc:creator>David Matney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-27242</guid>
		<description>Do the Magpul PMAG magazines work equally as well in the R15 with Remington .223 (as with 5.56 Nato?)

I would much rather risk asking a stupid question as apposed to wasting money on the wrong gear. (Stupid only costs a little pride).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do the Magpul PMAG magazines work equally as well in the R15 with Remington .223 (as with 5.56 Nato?)</p>
<p>I would much rather risk asking a stupid question as apposed to wasting money on the wrong gear. (Stupid only costs a little pride).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-26765</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 02:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-26765</guid>
		<description>Heath, very cool!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heath, very cool!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heath</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-26763</link>
		<dc:creator>Heath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 02:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-26763</guid>
		<description>Did you guys see that Remington is offering the R-15 in 450 Bushmaster now?

http://www.remington.com/products/firearms/centerfire/model-r-15/model-r-15-450-bushmaster.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you guys see that Remington is offering the R-15 in 450 Bushmaster now?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.remington.com/products/firearms/centerfire/model-r-15/model-r-15-450-bushmaster.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.remington.com/products/firearms/centerfire/model-r-15/model-r-15-450-bushmaster.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cope10</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-26744</link>
		<dc:creator>cope10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 23:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-26744</guid>
		<description>ok thanks testosterone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok thanks testosterone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: testosterone</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-26705</link>
		<dc:creator>testosterone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-26705</guid>
		<description>Dobbs,

Try calling bushmaster.  They are the ones making these rifles and other&#039;s have had luck getting max-1 camo parts from them.

-T</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dobbs,</p>
<p>Try calling bushmaster.  They are the ones making these rifles and other&#8217;s have had luck getting max-1 camo parts from them.</p>
<p>-T</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: testosterone</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-26704</link>
		<dc:creator>testosterone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-26704</guid>
		<description>Cope,

No reason not I suppose.  I don&#039;t shoot 3 gun but when i watch it, the rifle&#039;s are commonly 20&quot; AR&#039;s.

A standard R15 is 22&quot;, but I don&#039;t think it&#039;s going to hurt you.

-T</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cope,</p>
<p>No reason not I suppose.  I don&#8217;t shoot 3 gun but when i watch it, the rifle&#8217;s are commonly 20&#8243; AR&#8217;s.</p>
<p>A standard R15 is 22&#8243;, but I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s going to hurt you.</p>
<p>-T</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Matney</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-26689</link>
		<dc:creator>David Matney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-26689</guid>
		<description>CAT M-4 Tool:
I recently ran across the referenced recommended product in a Guns &amp; Ammo magazine article, who reported it to be an extremely useful and effective tool...

Per the manufacturer&#039;s application description; The CAT M-4 tool allows the operator to clean the weapon and restore the bolt and carrier group to tactical tolerance in a matter of minutes. In the field, with gloved hands, and in low-light conditions if necessary.
The CAT M-4 tool was designed to simplify weapons maintenance in the field, or at the range, for Soldiers and serious M4 and AR-15 shooters from all backgrounds.

Check it out at www.catm4.com

And no, I have no &quot;endorsement deal&quot;. I just thought it might be something useful to bring to your attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CAT M-4 Tool:<br />
I recently ran across the referenced recommended product in a Guns &amp; Ammo magazine article, who reported it to be an extremely useful and effective tool&#8230;</p>
<p>Per the manufacturer&#8217;s application description; The CAT M-4 tool allows the operator to clean the weapon and restore the bolt and carrier group to tactical tolerance in a matter of minutes. In the field, with gloved hands, and in low-light conditions if necessary.<br />
The CAT M-4 tool was designed to simplify weapons maintenance in the field, or at the range, for Soldiers and serious M4 and AR-15 shooters from all backgrounds.</p>
<p>Check it out at <a href="http://www.catm4.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.catm4.com</a></p>
<p>And no, I have no &#8220;endorsement deal&#8221;. I just thought it might be something useful to bring to your attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jw dobbs</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-26646</link>
		<dc:creator>jw dobbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 02:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-26646</guid>
		<description>where can i buy collaspable camo stock for the r15 30 cal called remington they would not sell me one i want it to match the gun camo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>where can i buy collaspable camo stock for the r15 30 cal called remington they would not sell me one i want it to match the gun camo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cope10</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-26556</link>
		<dc:creator>cope10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 17:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-26556</guid>
		<description>Hey guys I am looking to get my first AR.  I am a varmint hunter and im interested in 3 gun competition.  would the R-15 work for both or am i barking up the wrong tree?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey guys I am looking to get my first AR.  I am a varmint hunter and im interested in 3 gun competition.  would the R-15 work for both or am i barking up the wrong tree?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Matney</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-25427</link>
		<dc:creator>David Matney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 23:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-25427</guid>
		<description>To Steve Allen:
I’m sorry to hear that you are unhappy with your weapon and I’m not discounting your opinion. You paid your hard-earned money for the weapon, so you obviously earned the right to express your dissatisfaction. 

Speaking strictly from a consumer’s perspective; If I were completely dissatisfied with a weapon produced by one of the most well known &amp; respected firearms manufacturers in the world - personally I would be making calls and sending emails to the manufacturer (and not just to the Customer Service Dept). I am fairly confident that if the problems were due to poor quality or factory defect, Remington would be happy to take care of the issues. 

On the other hand; if I found myself generally dissatisfied with my purchase/investment, then I would sell or trade it for something which did satisfy me. But that’s just me…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Steve Allen:<br />
I’m sorry to hear that you are unhappy with your weapon and I’m not discounting your opinion. You paid your hard-earned money for the weapon, so you obviously earned the right to express your dissatisfaction. </p>
<p>Speaking strictly from a consumer’s perspective; If I were completely dissatisfied with a weapon produced by one of the most well known &amp; respected firearms manufacturers in the world &#8211; personally I would be making calls and sending emails to the manufacturer (and not just to the Customer Service Dept). I am fairly confident that if the problems were due to poor quality or factory defect, Remington would be happy to take care of the issues. </p>
<p>On the other hand; if I found myself generally dissatisfied with my purchase/investment, then I would sell or trade it for something which did satisfy me. But that’s just me…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Matney</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-25419</link>
		<dc:creator>David Matney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 23:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-25419</guid>
		<description>Thank you Staff Sgt Belliston. I appreciate your invaluable response and I assure you, the knowledge will not be wasted...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Staff Sgt Belliston. I appreciate your invaluable response and I assure you, the knowledge will not be wasted&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SSG Belliston</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-25268</link>
		<dc:creator>SSG Belliston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-25268</guid>
		<description>Response for David Matney,
I&#039;ve shot collapsable stocks and non collapsable stocks with abundant practice on each, Shooting out to 200 yds will not be a problem with either one. I own both types and prefer my collapseable stock. It maneuver&#039;s well and is plenty accurate. Even shooting out to 300 Meters isn&#039;t a problem. For quick shots, I like to shorten the stock a click or two and I can track tragets really well that way. For the longer shots you want to make, extending that stock will help give you some more stability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Response for David Matney,<br />
I&#8217;ve shot collapsable stocks and non collapsable stocks with abundant practice on each, Shooting out to 200 yds will not be a problem with either one. I own both types and prefer my collapseable stock. It maneuver&#8217;s well and is plenty accurate. Even shooting out to 300 Meters isn&#8217;t a problem. For quick shots, I like to shorten the stock a click or two and I can track tragets really well that way. For the longer shots you want to make, extending that stock will help give you some more stability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve allen</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-25251</link>
		<dc:creator>steve allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 21:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-25251</guid>
		<description>i have a r15 223 it is junk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have a r15 223 it is junk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Matney</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-25220</link>
		<dc:creator>David Matney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 18:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-25220</guid>
		<description>I really appreciate the responses &quot;T&quot; &amp; Fankster! 

Though I have never used anything more than the standard ole Hoppes cleaning kits (with the 3-piece rods) the one item I did put on my &quot;must have&quot; list, was a &quot;Gunslick&quot; one-piece carbon fiber cleaning rod! 

Thanks again to both of you!
D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really appreciate the responses &#8220;T&#8221; &amp; Fankster! </p>
<p>Though I have never used anything more than the standard ole Hoppes cleaning kits (with the 3-piece rods) the one item I did put on my &#8220;must have&#8221; list, was a &#8220;Gunslick&#8221; one-piece carbon fiber cleaning rod! </p>
<p>Thanks again to both of you!<br />
D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frankster</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-25142</link>
		<dc:creator>Frankster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-25142</guid>
		<description>In response to David Matney question on the CS stock. My R-15 CS has no noted play or wobble in it. I have not use a fixed stock, but I have found my CS to be a very solid stock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to David Matney question on the CS stock. My R-15 CS has no noted play or wobble in it. I have not use a fixed stock, but I have found my CS to be a very solid stock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Testosterone</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-25138</link>
		<dc:creator>Testosterone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-25138</guid>
		<description>Dave,

My belief is barrel break-in is black magic, and unless you are shooting in benchrest competition/long range competition is something for someone else to obsess over.

You will never know the difference.

A bronze cleaning rod will not damage a rifle bore of used responsibly.

I&#039;m partial to one piece coated or carbon fiber cleaning rods just because life is to short to use three piece jobs IMO.

-T</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave,</p>
<p>My belief is barrel break-in is black magic, and unless you are shooting in benchrest competition/long range competition is something for someone else to obsess over.</p>
<p>You will never know the difference.</p>
<p>A bronze cleaning rod will not damage a rifle bore of used responsibly.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m partial to one piece coated or carbon fiber cleaning rods just because life is to short to use three piece jobs IMO.</p>
<p>-T</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Testosterone</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-25135</link>
		<dc:creator>Testosterone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-25135</guid>
		<description>David,

I personally don&#039;t think a 3lb trigger is to light for hunting.  

If you have shot a 1911 style pistol with a high quality trigger that is exactly what the argold trigger is like.

A tiny amount of takeup followed by resistance then a perfect break.

The factory R15 trigger is absolute junk inspite of reports to the contrary.

-T</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p>
<p>I personally don&#8217;t think a 3lb trigger is to light for hunting.  </p>
<p>If you have shot a 1911 style pistol with a high quality trigger that is exactly what the argold trigger is like.</p>
<p>A tiny amount of takeup followed by resistance then a perfect break.</p>
<p>The factory R15 trigger is absolute junk inspite of reports to the contrary.</p>
<p>-T</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Harper</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-25096</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Harper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 20:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-25096</guid>
		<description>Thank J. W.

I may go out this weekend to sight it in that is a big help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank J. W.</p>
<p>I may go out this weekend to sight it in that is a big help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Matney</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-25088</link>
		<dc:creator>David Matney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 19:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-25088</guid>
		<description>New barrel break-in, bore guides and solutions-solvents…
Without a doubt, the most confusing subjects I have tackled recently are those referenced above. I have read the elaborate break-in procedures for rifle barrels that some gun writers promote, which have rigid schedules that they insist must be followed or you&#039;ll risk ruining the barrel. 

Then there is the “bore guide issue” and statements like; “More barrels are damaged by cleaning rods than by any amount of regular shooting a person may do”, and ”Without a good bore guide you are just wasting your time trying to break-in a barrel or cleaning it for that matter”. 
They typically recommend “one brand” of bore guide, and one-piece rubber coated or graphite cleaning rods, then recommend enough Solvents to fill an entire closet!
USP Bore Paste, Wipe-Out bore foam, Butch’s Bore Shine, Clenzoil, and “the entire line of “KG Solvents!”

So I seek guidance from experienced “AR” users, and ask someone to please “separate the necessary, from the bull?”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New barrel break-in, bore guides and solutions-solvents…<br />
Without a doubt, the most confusing subjects I have tackled recently are those referenced above. I have read the elaborate break-in procedures for rifle barrels that some gun writers promote, which have rigid schedules that they insist must be followed or you&#8217;ll risk ruining the barrel. </p>
<p>Then there is the “bore guide issue” and statements like; “More barrels are damaged by cleaning rods than by any amount of regular shooting a person may do”, and ”Without a good bore guide you are just wasting your time trying to break-in a barrel or cleaning it for that matter”.<br />
They typically recommend “one brand” of bore guide, and one-piece rubber coated or graphite cleaning rods, then recommend enough Solvents to fill an entire closet!<br />
USP Bore Paste, Wipe-Out bore foam, Butch’s Bore Shine, Clenzoil, and “the entire line of “KG Solvents!”</p>
<p>So I seek guidance from experienced “AR” users, and ask someone to please “separate the necessary, from the bull?”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Matney</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-25078</link>
		<dc:creator>David Matney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-25078</guid>
		<description>Collapsible Stock - Stability…
I would like to know from R-15 Carbine (CS) “Collapsible Stock” users if there is any noticeable wobble when the stock is fully extended? I would most definitely appreciate feedback on the stability comparison from anyone who has actually compared (shot) the “Fixed” as well as the “CS” stock. The majority of my shooting will be fairly quick shots under 200yds (with Hornady 55gr V-MAX or similar) but I would still hope to achieve between 3”-4” MOA at 300yds…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Collapsible Stock &#8211; Stability…<br />
I would like to know from R-15 Carbine (CS) “Collapsible Stock” users if there is any noticeable wobble when the stock is fully extended? I would most definitely appreciate feedback on the stability comparison from anyone who has actually compared (shot) the “Fixed” as well as the “CS” stock. The majority of my shooting will be fairly quick shots under 200yds (with Hornady 55gr V-MAX or similar) but I would still hope to achieve between 3”-4” MOA at 300yds…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Matney</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-25073</link>
		<dc:creator>David Matney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-25073</guid>
		<description>AR Gold - Trigger Setting…
I believe the factory R-15 trigger setting is approximately 5-1/2lbs. I prefer a really light trigger setting and would like to know from any experienced AR-Gold users (testosterone) if a 3lb setting is too light for use on the R-15?
Most of my shooting with be precise one-shot-one-kill Predator hunting, with the (hopefully) ocassional follow-up. 

Obviously there will be periodic Rambo Rapid-fire occurrences at the range with UMC-FMJ ammo, when I need to get in-touch with my sensitive-side!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AR Gold &#8211; Trigger Setting…<br />
I believe the factory R-15 trigger setting is approximately 5-1/2lbs. I prefer a really light trigger setting and would like to know from any experienced AR-Gold users (testosterone) if a 3lb setting is too light for use on the R-15?<br />
Most of my shooting with be precise one-shot-one-kill Predator hunting, with the (hopefully) ocassional follow-up. </p>
<p>Obviously there will be periodic Rambo Rapid-fire occurrences at the range with UMC-FMJ ammo, when I need to get in-touch with my sensitive-side!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.W.</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-24970</link>
		<dc:creator>J.W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 15:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-24970</guid>
		<description>I own a number of AR&#039;s, and a couple of them had &#039;Red/Green Dot&#039; sights installed.

Dot-Sights are normally used for shorter range shooting (200 yards or less), and the majority of these sights come with a 4-MOA or larger dot size.  Of course this means that at 100 yards the dot would cover a 4&quot; circle, at 200 yards it would cover a 8&quot; circle, etc.

When sighting in a rifle/carbine with a dot-sight many people set the POI at the 12 o&#039;clock position of the dot.  This is beneficial as the dot does not cover the target, as the bullet will hit at it&#039;s very top.  By doing this accurate longer range shooting can be accomplished even when using larger MOA dot sizes.

Some dot-sights even have adjustable dot MOA sizes, such as the Nikon Monarch VSD.  On this specific sight the dot size can be adjusted from 1-MOA to 10-MOA and the dot has 11 brightness settings, making it one of the better choices for both short and long range shooting for those that prefer dot-sight systems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I own a number of AR&#8217;s, and a couple of them had &#8216;Red/Green Dot&#8217; sights installed.</p>
<p>Dot-Sights are normally used for shorter range shooting (200 yards or less), and the majority of these sights come with a 4-MOA or larger dot size.  Of course this means that at 100 yards the dot would cover a 4&#8243; circle, at 200 yards it would cover a 8&#8243; circle, etc.</p>
<p>When sighting in a rifle/carbine with a dot-sight many people set the POI at the 12 o&#8217;clock position of the dot.  This is beneficial as the dot does not cover the target, as the bullet will hit at it&#8217;s very top.  By doing this accurate longer range shooting can be accomplished even when using larger MOA dot sizes.</p>
<p>Some dot-sights even have adjustable dot MOA sizes, such as the Nikon Monarch VSD.  On this specific sight the dot size can be adjusted from 1-MOA to 10-MOA and the dot has 11 brightness settings, making it one of the better choices for both short and long range shooting for those that prefer dot-sight systems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Harper</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-24717</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Harper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-24717</guid>
		<description>Thanks David
I just got my R-15 last week put a Red/Green dot scope on it last night. I have been told by some friends I would not like it. They said at a distance to dot would cover up the varmit. But I&#039;m going to try it, it may be fun. Where I live its real cold right now so it may be a week or so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks David<br />
I just got my R-15 last week put a Red/Green dot scope on it last night. I have been told by some friends I would not like it. They said at a distance to dot would cover up the varmit. But I&#8217;m going to try it, it may be fun. Where I live its real cold right now so it may be a week or so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Matney</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-24628</link>
		<dc:creator>David Matney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-24628</guid>
		<description>In order to answer my previous unanswered ammo question, I have drawn upon earlier individual postings within this blog and applied my own research in order to develop this response. I am obviously “not” the expert, but can generally put 2+2 together. I am referring strictly to “Factory Loaded” ammunition.

When seeking superior performance, both in accuracy &amp; rapid bullet expansion (related to Predator/Varmint hunting) the key is soft-nose/ballistic tip ammunition which are typically found in the “V-Series” product lines such as; Remington ACCUTIP-V, Federal V-SHOK, Hornaday V-MAX, etc.
Since no two rifles (or shooters) are the same, experimentation and comparison on the range is ultimately going to determine what works best for each individual. When it comes to “caliber preference” again, it comes down to personal preference (and what works best for each individual). Personally, I will focus on 55gr which is consistently around 3240fps muzzle velocity, since my Nikon Coyote Special scope with built-in (BDC) was developed/calibrated at 3200fps. Hope this helps…

FMJ (full metal jacket) ammo such as Remington-UMC is an inexpensive alternative for general shooting, such as; practice, plinking and burning through those rapid-fire &quot;Rambo&quot; moments, but will not exhibit the desired bullet expansion for hunting applications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In order to answer my previous unanswered ammo question, I have drawn upon earlier individual postings within this blog and applied my own research in order to develop this response. I am obviously “not” the expert, but can generally put 2+2 together. I am referring strictly to “Factory Loaded” ammunition.</p>
<p>When seeking superior performance, both in accuracy &amp; rapid bullet expansion (related to Predator/Varmint hunting) the key is soft-nose/ballistic tip ammunition which are typically found in the “V-Series” product lines such as; Remington ACCUTIP-V, Federal V-SHOK, Hornaday V-MAX, etc.<br />
Since no two rifles (or shooters) are the same, experimentation and comparison on the range is ultimately going to determine what works best for each individual. When it comes to “caliber preference” again, it comes down to personal preference (and what works best for each individual). Personally, I will focus on 55gr which is consistently around 3240fps muzzle velocity, since my Nikon Coyote Special scope with built-in (BDC) was developed/calibrated at 3200fps. Hope this helps…</p>
<p>FMJ (full metal jacket) ammo such as Remington-UMC is an inexpensive alternative for general shooting, such as; practice, plinking and burning through those rapid-fire &#8220;Rambo&#8221; moments, but will not exhibit the desired bullet expansion for hunting applications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Matney</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-24624</link>
		<dc:creator>David Matney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-24624</guid>
		<description>Dennis,
In the absence of any response to my question, I did my own research and can report my findings on both issues. I will address the forend rail issue first, then my ammo findings in the following separate posting. 

Remington manufactures a 4” Picatinny forend rail in matching MAX-1 HD camo which can be purchased directly through Remington, or from most Remington R-15 retailers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis,<br />
In the absence of any response to my question, I did my own research and can report my findings on both issues. I will address the forend rail issue first, then my ammo findings in the following separate posting. </p>
<p>Remington manufactures a 4” Picatinny forend rail in matching MAX-1 HD camo which can be purchased directly through Remington, or from most Remington R-15 retailers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Matney</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-24623</link>
		<dc:creator>David Matney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-24623</guid>
		<description>Dennis,
In the absence of any response to my questions, I did my own research and can report my findings on both issues. I will address the forend rail issue here first, then my ammo findings in the following separate posting. 

Remington manufactures a 4” Picatinny forend rail in matching MAX-1 HD camo which can be purchased directly from Remington.com, or most Remington R-15 retailers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis,<br />
In the absence of any response to my questions, I did my own research and can report my findings on both issues. I will address the forend rail issue here first, then my ammo findings in the following separate posting. </p>
<p>Remington manufactures a 4” Picatinny forend rail in matching MAX-1 HD camo which can be purchased directly from Remington.com, or most Remington R-15 retailers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Harper</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-24594</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Harper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 19:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-24594</guid>
		<description>I have the same questions as David if you can answer it would be great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the same questions as David if you can answer it would be great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Matney</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-24528</link>
		<dc:creator>David Matney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 19:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-24528</guid>
		<description>Can anyone tell me what rail/s will fit the factory drilled/tapped forend tube on the R-15?

Also, I would greatly appreciate any/all feedback regarding individual preferences in .223 factory ammo which encompasses the best combined characteristics for both; predator hunting &amp; accuracy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can anyone tell me what rail/s will fit the factory drilled/tapped forend tube on the R-15?</p>
<p>Also, I would greatly appreciate any/all feedback regarding individual preferences in .223 factory ammo which encompasses the best combined characteristics for both; predator hunting &amp; accuracy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boyd</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-23808</link>
		<dc:creator>boyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 03:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-23808</guid>
		<description>You guys all had alot of great input.I enjoyed reading it and found it helpfull in answering some questions I didnt even know I had about my own R15 18&quot; compact predator.Headed out tomorrow to kill some coyotes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys all had alot of great input.I enjoyed reading it and found it helpfull in answering some questions I didnt even know I had about my own R15 18&#8243; compact predator.Headed out tomorrow to kill some coyotes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: testosterone</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-23655</link>
		<dc:creator>testosterone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-23655</guid>
		<description>I have an AR Gold trigger, it is fantastic.

I will put one in every AR I ever own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have an AR Gold trigger, it is fantastic.</p>
<p>I will put one in every AR I ever own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Matney</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-23617</link>
		<dc:creator>David Matney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 18:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-23617</guid>
		<description>I was curious if anyone has installed the AR-Gold Trigger System by American Trigger.com? I ran across the referenced product in the most current issue of “Rifle Shooter Magazine”. The advertised benefits are; a fine &quot;bolt action&quot; feeling trigger, lightning fast reset, and a wide range of trigger weight. Any thoughts/opinions would be greatly appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was curious if anyone has installed the AR-Gold Trigger System by American Trigger.com? I ran across the referenced product in the most current issue of “Rifle Shooter Magazine”. The advertised benefits are; a fine &#8220;bolt action&#8221; feeling trigger, lightning fast reset, and a wide range of trigger weight. Any thoughts/opinions would be greatly appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike lamb</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-23539</link>
		<dc:creator>mike lamb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 01:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-23539</guid>
		<description>I have a R-15 in .204 love it ,shoots 1/4 moa at 100yds 2&quot; at 300yds.
I have a burris  P.E.P.R 30mm quick detach forward mount with a 6.5-20x50mm LR leuplod VX3 on it for ground hogs,and a PEPR 1&quot; burris forward mount with a 3-9X50 VX2 leupold  for coyotes ,can take either scope off an on with zero un changed ,my 3-9x50  has a ND3 lazer lite mounted to it .It&#039;s almost cheatin  just but a JP ajustable trigger in set at #3  going to range tomorrow ,stock trigger good  ,but still alittle stiff,jp is nice can&#039;t wait</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a R-15 in .204 love it ,shoots 1/4 moa at 100yds 2&#8243; at 300yds.<br />
I have a burris  P.E.P.R 30mm quick detach forward mount with a 6.5-20&#215;50mm LR leuplod VX3 on it for ground hogs,and a PEPR 1&#8243; burris forward mount with a 3-9X50 VX2 leupold  for coyotes ,can take either scope off an on with zero un changed ,my 3-9&#215;50  has a ND3 lazer lite mounted to it .It&#8217;s almost cheatin  just but a JP ajustable trigger in set at #3  going to range tomorrow ,stock trigger good  ,but still alittle stiff,jp is nice can&#8217;t wait</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frankster</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-22442</link>
		<dc:creator>Frankster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 21:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-22442</guid>
		<description>Does any one know if or how the forearm on the R-15  can be removed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does any one know if or how the forearm on the R-15  can be removed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spinninyotes</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-21365</link>
		<dc:creator>Spinninyotes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 05:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-21365</guid>
		<description>Hey..for anyone out there thinking about buying the R15 Thumbhole stock...DON&#039;T. I special ordered one..came in and found that a right handed shooter cannot access the safety switch...SERIOUS DESIGN FLAW...I have large hands and can reach it...AT ALL. The only way to get the 24&quot; barrel is either stainless with a OD green receiver or the thumbhole stock. I contacted Remingtion...they would not sell me the A2 stock or pistol grip in the Max 1 camo...Bushmaster, however, did and it is interchangable...and they carry it in Max 1. So..I purchased it. The second problem I had was that the standard one inch scope rings are too short..you will need the half inch riser...again...only in Max 1 camo from Remingtion...sooo..if you are buying this gun...other than that...LOVE all my Remington guns...and this one is no exception...1/2 in. moa at 100 yards and puts the smack on the dogs...just what the doctor ordered! Oh ya...and I would change out the pistol grip for the Hogue...ergo friendly and way comfortable!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey..for anyone out there thinking about buying the R15 Thumbhole stock&#8230;DON&#8217;T. I special ordered one..came in and found that a right handed shooter cannot access the safety switch&#8230;SERIOUS DESIGN FLAW&#8230;I have large hands and can reach it&#8230;AT ALL. The only way to get the 24&#8243; barrel is either stainless with a OD green receiver or the thumbhole stock. I contacted Remingtion&#8230;they would not sell me the A2 stock or pistol grip in the Max 1 camo&#8230;Bushmaster, however, did and it is interchangable&#8230;and they carry it in Max 1. So..I purchased it. The second problem I had was that the standard one inch scope rings are too short..you will need the half inch riser&#8230;again&#8230;only in Max 1 camo from Remingtion&#8230;sooo..if you are buying this gun&#8230;other than that&#8230;LOVE all my Remington guns&#8230;and this one is no exception&#8230;1/2 in. moa at 100 yards and puts the smack on the dogs&#8230;just what the doctor ordered! Oh ya&#8230;and I would change out the pistol grip for the Hogue&#8230;ergo friendly and way comfortable!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sean</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-18343</link>
		<dc:creator>sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-18343</guid>
		<description>Rowdy,

I have no authoatative data, but I have read numerous times that you generally sacrifice about 50fps of velocity for every inch of barrel removed.

that is generally referenced at 100 yds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rowdy,</p>
<p>I have no authoatative data, but I have read numerous times that you generally sacrifice about 50fps of velocity for every inch of barrel removed.</p>
<p>that is generally referenced at 100 yds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
