<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Remington R-15, the new AR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 22:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-1959</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 02:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-1959</guid>
		<description>Probably will be fine being an AR. Its not a question of chambering but of pressure.

From wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5.56x45mm_NATO)

While the 5.56 mm and .223 cartridges are very similar, they are not identical. Military cases are made from thicker brass than commercial cases, which reduces the powder capacity (an important consideration for handloaders), and the NATO specification allows a higher chamber pressure. Test barrels made for 5.56 mm NATO measure chamber pressure at a the case mouth, as opposed to the SAAMI location. This difference accounts for upwards of 20,000 psi (140 MPa) difference in pressure measurements. That means that advertised pressure of 58,000 psi (400 MPa) for 5.56 mm NATO, is around 78,000 psi (540 MPa) tested in .223 Rem test barrels. The 5.56 mm chambering, known as a NATO or mil-spec chambers, have a longer lead, which is the distance between the mouth of the cartridge and the point at which the rifling engages the bullet. The .223 chambering, known as SAAMI chamber, is allowed to have a shorter leade, and is only required to be proof tested to the lower SAAMI chamber pressure. To address these issues, various proprietary chambers exist, such as the Wylde chamber (Rock River Arms)[1] or the Armalite chamber, which are designed to handle both 5.56 mm and .223 equally well.

Using commercial .223 cartridges in a 5.56-chambered rifle should work reliably, but generally will not be as accurate as when fired from a .223-chambered gun due to the excessive lead.[2] Using 5.56 mil-spec cartridges (such as the M855) in a .223-chambered rifle can lead to excessive wear and stress on the rifle and even be unsafe, and the SAAMI recommends against the practice.[3] Some commercial rifles marked as ".223 Remington" are in fact suited for 5.56 mm, such as many commercial AR-15 variants and the Ruger Mini-14, but the manufacturer should always be consulted to verify that this is acceptable before attempting it, and signs of excessive pressure (such as flattening or gas staining of the primers) should be looked for in the initial testing with 5.56 mm ammunition.[4]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably will be fine being an AR. Its not a question of chambering but of pressure.</p>
<p>From wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5.56&#215;45mm_NATO)</p>
<p>While the 5.56 mm and .223 cartridges are very similar, they are not identical. Military cases are made from thicker brass than commercial cases, which reduces the powder capacity (an important consideration for handloaders), and the NATO specification allows a higher chamber pressure. Test barrels made for 5.56 mm NATO measure chamber pressure at a the case mouth, as opposed to the SAAMI location. This difference accounts for upwards of 20,000 psi (140 MPa) difference in pressure measurements. That means that advertised pressure of 58,000 psi (400 MPa) for 5.56 mm NATO, is around 78,000 psi (540 MPa) tested in .223 Rem test barrels. The 5.56 mm chambering, known as a NATO or mil-spec chambers, have a longer lead, which is the distance between the mouth of the cartridge and the point at which the rifling engages the bullet. The .223 chambering, known as SAAMI chamber, is allowed to have a shorter leade, and is only required to be proof tested to the lower SAAMI chamber pressure. To address these issues, various proprietary chambers exist, such as the Wylde chamber (Rock River Arms)[1] or the Armalite chamber, which are designed to handle both 5.56 mm and .223 equally well.</p>
<p>Using commercial .223 cartridges in a 5.56-chambered rifle should work reliably, but generally will not be as accurate as when fired from a .223-chambered gun due to the excessive lead.[2] Using 5.56 mil-spec cartridges (such as the M855) in a .223-chambered rifle can lead to excessive wear and stress on the rifle and even be unsafe, and the SAAMI recommends against the practice.[3] Some commercial rifles marked as &#8220;.223 Remington&#8221; are in fact suited for 5.56 mm, such as many commercial AR-15 variants and the Ruger Mini-14, but the manufacturer should always be consulted to verify that this is acceptable before attempting it, and signs of excessive pressure (such as flattening or gas staining of the primers) should be looked for in the initial testing with 5.56 mm ammunition.[4]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-1958</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 23:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-1958</guid>
		<description>Does anyone know if the rifle will chamber military 5.56mm?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know if the rifle will chamber military 5.56mm?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-1181</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 01:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-1181</guid>
		<description>Hi doug, give them a call to find out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi doug, give them a call to find out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doug</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-1179</link>
		<dc:creator>doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 15:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-1179</guid>
		<description>I have seen different pictures of the r 15 carbine (18" bbl ) some of them have the long handgaurd which covers the gas block and on the remington web site it shows a short handgaurd, which will be produced and if you order one how will you know which one you will get?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have seen different pictures of the r 15 carbine (18&#8243; bbl ) some of them have the long handgaurd which covers the gas block and on the remington web site it shows a short handgaurd, which will be produced and if you order one how will you know which one you will get?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-681</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 05:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-681</guid>
		<description>I do not think they will offer a thumbhole stock unless they plan on offering a California legal version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not think they will offer a thumbhole stock unless they plan on offering a California legal version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-680</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 05:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-680</guid>
		<description>Hi, Does anyone know if the R-15 will be comming out with a Thumbhole stock?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Does anyone know if the R-15 will be comming out with a Thumbhole stock?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-676</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 02:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-676</guid>
		<description>I would guess a 1 in 9. The rifle is very similar to the Bushmaster Varminter. Remington and Bushmaster have the same parent company.

"Rifling:  	1 turn in 9â€ [22.8 cm] R.H. Twist / 6 grooves &#038; lands".

From : http://bushmaster.com/catalog_xm15_PCWVMS24FVAR9.asp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would guess a 1 in 9. The rifle is very similar to the Bushmaster Varminter. Remington and Bushmaster have the same parent company.</p>
<p>&#8220;Rifling:  	1 turn in 9â€ [22.8 cm] R.H. Twist / 6 grooves &#038; lands&#8221;.</p>
<p>From : <a href="http://bushmaster.com/catalog_xm15_PCWVMS24FVAR9.asp" rel="nofollow">http://bushmaster.com/catalog_xm15_PCWVMS24FVAR9.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-674</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 02:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2007/10/18/remington-r-15-the-new-ar/#comment-674</guid>
		<description>does anyone know what the twist rate will be</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>does anyone know what the twist rate will be</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
